Tuesday, August 12, 2025

Hyssop-אזוב-Significance and Fulfillment

Preface

Hyssop (אזוב) is a small, bushy herb deeply woven into the fabric of biblical rituals, symbolizing purification and the application of sacrificial blood. Its recurring presence in the Torah and New Testament points to profound spiritual truths, particularly the cleansing from sin and death through Yahusha haMashiach . This note explores hyssop’s role in key purification rituals—Passover, the cleansing of the leper, and the red heifer ceremony—revealing its prophetic significance as a foreshadowing of Messiah’s redemptive work. By examining its use in scripture, alongside its gematria value of 16, we uncover how hyssop bridges the earthly and divine, culminating in its appearance at the crucifixion, where the shadow of Torah rituals meets the reality of Yahusha’s sacrifice.

🍃Hyssop (אזוב) : is a small, bushy herb mentioned repeatedly in the Scriptures, often associated with ritual purification and sacrificial blood applications. It holds rich symbolic meaning in both the Tanakh (Old Testament) and the New Testament (Brit Hadashah), especially in relation to cleansing from sin and pointing prophetically to Yahusha haMashiach.

📘1. Exodus 12:22 – Passover in Egypt

“And you shall take a bunch of hyssop, and dip it in the blood that is in the basin, and strike the lintel and the two side posts with the blood…”

Hyssop was used to apply lamb’s blood on the doorposts.

It allowed the blood to be applied without directly touching it with the hand, which is significant because 

Blood was sacred — it represented life (Leviticus 17:11) and could not be eaten or treated casually.

It would keep a priest away from religious impurity

2. Purification of skin diseases 

📖Lev 14:6  “Let him take the live bird and the cedar wood and the scarlet and the hyssop, and dip them and the live bird in the blood of the bird that was slain over the running water. 

it’s a ritual “sprinkler” — avoiding direct touch with the purifying liquid.

🐄3. Numbers 19 — Red Heifer Water of Purification

📖Num 19:6  And the priest shall take cedar wood and hyssop and scarlet, and throw them into the midst of the fire burning the heifer. 

📖Num 19:18  And a clean man shall take hyssop and dip it in the water, and shall sprinkle it on the tent, and on all the vessels, and on the beings who were there, or on the one who touched a bone, or the slain, or the dead, or a burial-site. 

So the exclusive Torah command for hyssop in applying blood is Exodus 12:22 — the original Passover.

In other cases, it applies purifying water/blood mixtures, not purely blood from a lamb.

Azub אזוב has gematria value of 16

Aleph =1 Zayin = 7 Uau= 6 Beyt= 2. Total 16

The ashes of the red heifer (parah adumah: פרה אדמה) were not part of the Day of Atonement service — they were a separate ritual described in Numbers 19.

Their purpose was to deal with the most severe form of ritual impurity: contact with death.

❓Why they were needed

In Torah, coming into contact with a human corpse — even being under the same roof — caused a person to become טמא לנפש (tamei lanefesh, ritually impure because of a dead body).

This impurity was considered so severe that:

The person could not enter the Tabernacle/Temple precincts.

If they entered while still impure, they would be cut off (karet) from YasharaEL (Numbers 19:13).

📖Num 19:9  And a clean man shall gather up the ashes of the heifer, and shall place them outside the camp in a clean place. And they shall be kept for the congregation of the children of Yisra’ěl for the water for uncleanness, it is for cleansing from sin
📖Num 19:10  And he who gathers the ashes of the heifer shall wash his garments, and is unclean until evening. And it shall be a law forever to the children of Yisra’ěl and to the stranger who sojourns in their midst. 
📖Num 19:11  He who touches the dead of any human being is unclean for seven days. 
📖Num 19:12  He is to cleanse himself with the water on the third day, and on the seventh day he is clean. But if he does not cleanse himself on the third day, then on the seventh day he is not clean. 
📖Num 19:13  Anyone who touches the dead of a human being, and does not cleanse himself, defiles the Dwelling Place of יהוה. And that being shall be cut off from Yisra’ěl. He is unclean, for the water for uncleanness was not sprinkled on him, his uncleanness is still upon him. 
📖Num 19:14  This is the Torah when a man dies in a tent: All who come into the tent and all who are in the tent are unclean for seven days, 
📖Num 19:16  Anyone in the open field who touches someone slain by a sword or who has died, or a bone of a man, or a burial-site, is unclean for seven days. 
📖Num 19:21  And it shall be a law for them forever. And the one who sprinkles the water for uncleanness washes his garments. And the one who touches the water for uncleanness is unclean until evening. 

Normal washing in water was not enough for this kind of defilement.

Only the “water of purification” (מי נדה) made from the ashes of the red heifer mixed with living water could remove it.

According to Numbers 19:11–22, the following people had to be cleansed with it:

1. Anyone who touched a dead body (v. 11)

2. Anyone present in a tent/house where someone died (v. 14)

3. Anyone who touched a human bone or a grave (v. 16)

4. Anyone who touched a person slain in battle (v. 16)

5. The gatherer of the ashes (v. 10) and the sprinkler of the water (v. 21) — because handling the purification materials paradoxically made them temporarily impure until evening.

The Torah (Numbers 19:17) just says the ashes of the red heifer had to be mixed with "living water" (mayim chayim), which means flowing, fresh, spring water — not stagnant water from a cistern.

It does not specify which spring in the text.

However, later Jewish tradition (especially from the Mishnah Parah and Temple sources) says that in Yerushalayim during the Second Temple period, the water for purification was indeed brought from the Gihon Spring in the Kidron Valley.

This makes sense because:

  • Gihon was the main natural spring near Yerushalayim.

  • It was considered ritually pure because it was running water.

  • It was also used for Temple service water supplies.

So while Torah doesn’t name Gihon, historically in Temple times they likely did use it for the red heifer water.

The Hebrew word גיחון (Gichon / Gihon) comes from the root גיח (giyach), meaning “to burst forth,” “gush,” or “break out.”

So Gihon literally means:

  • Bursting forth

  • Gushing stream

  • Outpouring

In scripture, it’s used for:

  1. One of the four rivers in Eden (Genesis 2:13) — the one said to “compass the whole land of Cush.”

  2. The spring of Gihon in Yerushalayim — the main water source of the city in King David’s time, famous for its sudden surges of water.

The name captures the idea of a sudden, strong outflow, whether of water or, symbolically, of life and blessing.

❓How it was used

1. The ashes were stored outside the camp (v. 9).

2. When needed, a small portion was mixed with living water (flowing or spring water).

3. On the third and seventh day after the defilement, a clean person would sprinkle the mixture on the defiled person, their clothes, and their tent (v. 12, 19).

4. After the seventh-day sprinkling, they bathed in water and were clean by evening.

🛎️Significance:

1. Death was the ultimate uncleanness — representing separation from Yahuah, the Source of life.

2. The ashes came from a completely red, unblemished cow, burnt outside the camp — a picture later applied to Messiah (Hebrews 9:13–14; 13:11–12) as the one who cleanses the conscience from the defilement of death.

3. The paradox: the ashes cleansed the unclean, yet made the clean person who prepared or applied them temporarily unclean.

This illustrated that sin and death are contagious, but cleansing comes from Yahuah’s appointed means.

📖Heb 9:13  For if the blood of bulls and goats and the ashes of a heifer, sprinkling the defiled, sets apart for the cleansing of the flesh, 
📖Heb 9:14  how much more shall the blood of the Messiah, who through the everlasting Spirit offered Himself unblemished to Elohim, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living Elohim?

📖Heb 13:11  For the bodies of those beasts whose blood is brought into the Set-apart Place by the high priest for sin, are burned outside the camp. 
📖Heb 13:12  And so יהושע also suffered outside the gate, to set apart the people with His own blood.

In Numbers 19, the Torah calls it פרה אדמה (parah adumah — “red heifer”), but the Hebrew words themselves carry layers of meaning:

אדם (adam) = “man,” but also “red” (root dam: דם — blood). It connects directly to the first Adam, made from the adamah (ground).

פרה (parah) = “heifer,” but also from the root פרה “to be fruitful, to increase.”

So פרה אדמה (parah adamah) can be read symbolically as “the fruitful red man” — a picture of Messiah Yahusha as the last Adam (1 Cor 15:45), fruitful in obedience even unto death, whose blood cleanses from defilement.

🖋️The Torah specifies:

📖”…he shall purify himself with it on the third day, and on the seventh day he shall be clean” (Numbers 19:12).

the third day in the parah adumah (red heifer) ritual clearly points to Yahusha’s resurrection (Hoshea 6:2, Mattityahu 17:23), because the unclean person could not be restored without the midway sprinkling.

🌩️The seventh day cleansing carries a second, deeper prophetic layer:

In Hebrew thought, the 7th always symbolizes completion, covenant rest, and perfection (shabbat).

This points to the final, complete redemption — not just resurrection, but entry into eternal rest (Hebrews 4:9-10; Revelation 21:4).

The third-day cleansing = initial salvation and life from the dead.

The third day corresponds to Torah purification using Hyssop as Yahuah created all plant life on the third day. It also corresponds to the rosh (poisonous plants) which was mixed in gall and given to Yahusha before his impaling which we will see later.

📖Gen 1:11  And Elohim said, “Let the earth bring forth grass, the plant that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth.” And it came to be so. 
📖Gen 1:12  And the earth brought forth grass, the plant that yields seed according to its kind, and the tree that yields fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its kind. And Elohim saw that it was good. 
📖Gen 1:13  And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, the third day

The seventh-day cleansing = final sanctification at the end of the age when all uncleanness is gone — no more death, sin, or defilement.

In the parah adumah, the person is still considered unclean between days 3–6 — even after the first sprinkling. That matches our current state: resurrected in spirit, but still awaiting final glorification in body (Romans 8:23).

📖Rom 8:23  And not only so, but even we ourselves who have the first-fruits of the Spirit, we ourselves also groan within ourselves, eagerly waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body.

🛡️“Day 1 – Day 3 – Day 7” pattern:

🩸1. Passover (Exodus 12) – Hyssop applies the blood

Day 1: The lamb is slain at twilight on 14 Abib; blood is applied with hyssop.

Day 3: Messiah’s resurrection (3rd day from His death — Luke 24:46).

📖Luk 24:46  and said to them, “Thus it has been written, and so it was necessary for the Messiah to suffer and to rise again from the dead the third day, 

Day 7: The first weekly Shabbat within Unleavened Bread → beginning the count toward Shavuot (Omer count).

💦2. Cleansing of the Leper (Leviticus 14) – Hyssop used in purification

Day 1: Initial cleansing with blood & water (bird sacrifice, cedar wood, scarlet, hyssop).

Day 3: In leprosy law, mid-point washing and re-evaluation; doesn’t exist. It was a waiting time for Leper outside the camp. 

📅Day 1 — Outside the Camp (Lev 14:4–7)

  • Elements used:

    • Two live clean birds

    • Cedar wood

    • Scarlet yarn

    • Hyssop

  • Ritual:

    • One bird is slaughtered over living water (the water of purification from the ashes of the red heifer.), as 📖Hebrews 9:13 states ".... and the ashes of a heifer, sprinkling the defiled, sets apart for the cleansing of the flesh.."  Also 📖Num 19:9 says " And a clean man shall gather up the ashes of the heifer, and shall place them outside the camp in a clean place. And they shall be kept for the congregation of the children of Yisra’ěl for the water for uncleanness, it is for cleansing from sin"

    • That was where the leper was, outside the camp & that's where the ashes of the red heifer were stored

Leviticus 14:3 is huge for the typology.

📖Lev 14:3  and the priest shall go out of the camp, and the priest shall look and see, if the leprosy is healed in the leper, 

📌 Why the priest goes outside the camp:

  • The leper is cut off from YasharEL — physically and ritually “dead” to the community.

  • The priest’s movement outside the camp mirrors Yahusha, our High Priest, leaving the heavenly throne to come into the “place of the unclean” (Hebrews 13:11–13).

  • Outside the camp is also where the red heifer was burned (Numbers 19:3), and where Messiah was crucified (John 19:17–20).

📜 Link to the red heifer water:

  • If the leper is being inspected outside the camp, there’s no bronze laver there — the only “authorized” water that could be brought and used without defiling the priest would be living water mixed with the ashes of the red heifer, which was stored in a clean place outside the camp (Num. 19:9).

  • This keeps the priest clean while engaging with the “death” imagery of leprosy.

    • The live bird, cedar, scarlet, and hyssop are dipped in the blood of the slain bird.

    • The blood-water mixture is sprinkled seven times on the leper with the hyssop.

    • The live bird is then set free into the open field.

🛎️Significance:

  • Death + life — the slain bird represents death (end of the leper’s old, unclean life); the released bird represents restored life and freedom, pointing to death and resurrection of Yahusha.

  • Outside the camp — The leper is still not fully restored to community; this is an initial cleansing, like Yahusha’s death providing immediate atonement but not yet the fullness of resurrection life until He entered the heavenly sanctuary.

  • The materials (cedar, scarlet, hyssop) link directly to Passover and the Red Heifer — all are “application” imagery for cleansing blood and removing death defilement.

Day 7: Full entry back into the camp, restoration to the community — like the “Sabbath rest” after being made whole.

📅Day 8 — Inside the Camp (Lev 14:10–20, or 21–22 for the poor)

  • The leper has spent seven days in a transitional period — shaved, washed, staying in the camp but outside his tent.

  • On the 8th day, he comes to the priest at the entrance of the Tabernacle with his offerings.

  • For a poor leper:

    • One male lamb — guilt offering (asham).

    • One log of oil — waved before Yahuah.

    • Two turtledoves or pigeons — one sin offering (chatat), one burnt offering (olah).

Why not Day 3 cleansing for the leper?

Because the leper is not “death-defiled” but living in a prolonged state of exclusion — his condition is like being socially dead, not ritually dead by corpse contact as in Red Heifer ashes cleansing water (though the same water is used here for dead skin which is now restored).

🎵The Torah’s rhythm here is:

  • Day 1 → examine him declare him clean so he can start the return process.

  • Day 7 → complete restoration to worship and community.

The seven-day wait matches other “full-cycle” purifications (childbirth, bodily discharges, Nazirite defilement), where a complete week is the symbolic boundary between old state and new creation.

Significance:

  • 8th day = covenant renewal, new creation.

  • The guilt offering is about restoring him fully to his covenant position in YasharEL.

  • The sin offering clears the remaining impurity.

  • The burnt offering symbolizes total dedication to Yahuah going forward.

🖋️The Flow of Meaning

  • Day 1 — cleansing from the power of death and impurity → symbolic resurrection promise (bird released).

  • Days 2–7 — transition, separation, preparation. 7th Day admitted within the camp

  • Day 8 — full covenant restoration, acceptance in Yahuah’s presence through the offering.

🗲When read prophetically:
  • Day 1 = Messiah’s death and resurrection begun. (dead bird blood and live bird dipped in its blood and let to fly, also emblems of cedar wood (stake), hyssop (cleansing agent), scarlet (thread of redemption to be continued pointing to Messiah), living water (spring water mixed with ashes of red heifer)

  • Day 8 = New creation reality — the eternal priesthood (Melchizedek) bringing complete restoration into the heavenly dwelling. We declared clean and waiting for the redemption of our body (by His stripes we are healed), just as leper waited until the 7th Day.

🐂3. Red Heifer Ashes (Numbers 19) – Hyssop sprinkles the water of purification

 • Day 1: Contact with death → needs cleansing.

 • Day 3: First sprinkling — symbolic of resurrection life entering the defiled.

 • Day 7: Second sprinkling, then full cleansing — complete restoration and ability to enter the sanctuary.

🧩How it fits Passover–Resurrection imagery

It’s slightly different from the Red Heifer or Passover hyssop pattern, because here:

Passover (Day 1) → Blood applied immediately → person is covered.

Resurrection (Day 3) → New life manifest.

Leper → The focus is on first redemption and final restoration (Day 1 & Day 7) with a full new creation on Day 8.

This makes the leper cleansing more of a full salvation timeline:

Day 1 — Messiah’s sacrifice

Seven days — the Assembly age / sanctification

Day 7–8 — Return of Messiah, glorification, and entering the eternal covenant fully.

Significance of shaving of hair on 7th day for a leper:

📖Lev 14:9  “And on the seventh day it shall be that he shaves all the hair off his head and his beard and his eyebrows, even all his hair he shaves off. And he shall wash his garments and wash his body in water, and shall be clean. 

In Torah, שׂער (“hair”) in the leper’s cleansing isn’t just about hygiene; it carries a symbolic meaning tied to identity, inheritance, and transformation.

Edom / Esau — “hairy” (Esau was literally described as seir), connected to Mount Seir, a place representing the nation that lost its covenant birthright. Being outside the camp parallels being outside the covenant inheritance.

Shaving in leper’s cleansing — Symbolically removing the old identity (like Edom’s hairy nature), stripping away the old man who is alienated from the covenant.

Messiah’s cleansing — In Yahusha, the leper (excluded, unclean) is restored, regaining inheritance within YasharEL. This is a spiritual reversal of Edom’s fate — instead of losing the birthright, the cleansed leper receives it back through grace.

So shaving שׂער Seir here is like a paradigm shift — a visible sign that the old, rejected identity is gone, and the person is now restored to covenant life.

📖Gen 25:25  And the first came out red all over, like a hairy שׂער H8181 garment, so they called his name Ěsaw. 

📖Gen 36:8  So Ěsaw dwelt in Mount Seir שׂעיר H165. Ěsaw is Eḏom. 

Seir שׂעיר means hairy

In poetic texts, שׂערה (seʿarah) — from the same root — means storm, whirlwind (Job 38:1 – Then Yahuah answered Job out of the whirlwind).

Yahuah showing Ayob/Job that the whirlwind that He Himself will go through will be far greater than the suffering of Job.

🐐Goat’s Hair Covering on the Tabernacle

📖Exodus 26:7 – “And you shall make curtains of goat’s hair for a tent over the tabernacle…”

Goat’s hair was the outer covering over the fine linen curtains (which were closest to the Set Apart Place). Goat imagery is strongly tied to sin-bearing in Torah — especially the Azazel scapegoat on Yom Kippur (Leviticus 16). The goat’s hair covering symbolically stood as the visible outer layer of sin covering — the thing the people would see from outside, while the beauty of the linen (Messiah’s righteousness) was hidden beneath. Goat’s hair covering on the tabernacle = the sin layer that stands between Yahuah and His people. The common people of YasharEL couldn’t see within the Tabernacle.

Hair on the leper’s body = the visible outer mark of uncleanness that keeps him outside.

In Messiah, both are removed or transformed 

The veil was torn from top to bottom-way to the Most Set Apart Place made for His people. Now His people can see within.

The leper’s hair is shaved as a public sign of restored access to the camp (symbol of being welcomed back into YasharEL’s inheritance).

The Esau kind of treatment which Carnal Torah brought was eternally removed by Mashiyach Yahusha making us heirs in Him with full access to Sonship entry.

There is a waiting period though as seven days for a leper showing end of age for we are now adopted sons accessing the Dabar promises through the Ruach.

Hence, The tabernacle’s outer goat hair covering foreshadowed the sinner’s condition — separated by sin. The leper’s shaving is the removal of that old covering when atonement is applied.

In Messiah, the “goat covering” of sin is taken away, and the person is seen in the pure “linen” of righteousness.

➡️1. Torah provisions about defilement from a dead body

📖Numbers 19:11–13 — Whoever touches/naga נגע H5060 the dead body of any man is unclean 7 days. They must be cleansed with the ashes of the red heifer water on the 3rd and 7th days or they remain unclean and are cut off.

📖Numbers 9:6–13 — If someone is unclean because of a dead body or is away on a journey, they cannot keep Passover in the first month; they may keep it in the second month instead.

The priests at the stake (crucifixion) were literally within touching range of the body of Yahusha. Even if they did not physically touch Him, Numbers 19:14–16 says being in the same enclosed area as a dead body causes the same defilement. At Golgotha, they were within the “tent” zone of His death.

Naga H5060 נגע also means to to reach, extend, attain, arrive, come, approach, come near 

📖1Sa 14:9  “If they say this to us, ‘Wait until we come/naga נגע H5060 to you,’ then we shall stand still in our place and not go up to them. 

📖Lev 5:7  ‘And if he is unable to bring/naga נגע H5060 a lamb, then he shall bring to יהוה, he who has sinned, two turtledoves or two young pigeons, one for a sin offering and the other for an ascending offering. 

📖Jdg 20:34  And ten thousand chosen men from all Yisra’ěl came against Giḇ‛ah, and the battle was fierce. But they did not know that calamity was near/naga נגע H5060 them. 

📖2Sa 5:8  And David said on that day, Whosoever comes/naga נגע H5060 to the gutter, and smites the Yebusites, and the lame and the blind, that are hated of David's soul, he shall be chief and captain. Wherefore they said, The blind and the lame shall not come into the house. 

📖Ezr 3:1   Now when the seventh new moon came/naga נגע H5060, and the children of Yisra’ěl were in the cities, the people gathered as one man to Yerushalayim. 

Please Note: I’ve taken the context of Naga being used as coming of being near.

In Torah contexts about ritual impurity, נגע (naga) isn’t limited to direct touching — it can include coming into proximity to a corpse, leper, or other source of defilement (Numbers 19:11–13).

That means in the crucifixion scene, if priests or anyone else “approached” the dying body of Yahusha, the Torah’s naga language could apply, triggering the very red heifer cleansing requirement — and thus making the connection to the Second Passover provision in Numbers 9:6–13.

📖Mat 27:40  and saying, “You who destroy the Dwelling Place and build it in three days, save Yourself! If You are the Son of Elohim, come down from the stake.”
📖Mat 27:41  And likewise the chief priests, with the scribes and elders, mocking, said, 
📖Mat 27:42  “He saved others – He is unable to save Himself. If He is the Sovereign of Yisra’ěl, let Him now come down from the stake, and we shall believe Him.

📖Mrk 15:30  save Yourself, and come down from the stake!”
📖Mrk 15:31  And likewise the chief priests and the scribes, mocking to one another said, “He saved others, He is unable to save Himself.

📘Torah says:

📖Lev 21:10  ‘And the high priest among his brothers, on whose head the anointing oil was poured and who is ordained to wear the garments, does not unbind his head nor tear his garments, 
📖Lev 21:11  nor come near any dead body, nor defile himself for his father or his mother,

And here we have chief priests the representatives of the high priest performing his duties in his absence at the foot of the stake when Yahusha died. We already know that the high priest was disqualified as he tore his garments when he heard Yahusha’s testimony. Yahuah is showing us how the Torah keepers of the letter themselves were breaking Torah and were lawless even to their understanding of it.

They should have immediately:

1. Removed themselves from the scene.

2. Gone through the Numbers 19 purification on Day 3 and Day 7.

3. Deferred their Passover to the second month.

Instead, John 18:28 shows they were obsessed with “not being defiled” by entering Pilate’s hall so they could eat the Passover — yet ignored the greater defilement of corpse proximity.

📖Jhn 18:28  Then they led יהושע (Yahusha) from Qayapha to the palace, and it was early. And they themselves did not go into the palace, lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Pěsaḥ.

🌱Hyssop link — Passover, Leper, Red Heifer

Hyssop appears in all three cleansing shadows:

1. Passover (Exodus 12:22) — Hyssop dipped in lamb’s blood, applied to the doorposts.

2. Leper cleansing (Leviticus 14:4–7) — Hyssop used with cedar wood and scarlet in the blood-water ritual.

3. Red Heifer ashes (Numbers 19:6, 18) — Hyssop dipped in the purifying water to sprinkle the unclean.

✝️At the crucifixion:

📖Jhn 19:29  A bowl of sour wine stood there, and they filled a sponge with sour wine, put it on hyssop, and held it to His mouth. 

This unites all three hyssop uses:

Passover blood application → Yahusha is the Lamb.

Leper cleansing water-blood mix → His blood + water from His side purifies. Also, it says of Yahusha :

📖1Jn 5:6  This is the One that came by water and blood: יהושע Messiah, not only by water, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who bears witness, because the Spirit is the Truth. 

Red Heifer corpse defilement remedy → His death provides the only true purification from death.

💫The prophetic collision:

At Golgotha:

The priests were breaking Torah by standing in corpse proximity.

It was Passover week, so corpse defilement meant they were disqualified from the feast — unless they kept the second month Passover after purification.

The only true ashes-of-red-heifer water is the blood and water from Yahusha Himself (John 19:34).

The hyssop to His mouth signifies application of His offering, just as in Torah hyssop applied cleansing blood or water.

The chief priests thought they were the guardians of Torah purity, but:

They rejected the true Lamb.

They defiled themselves by His death.

They refused His blood-water cleansing.

They missed the only valid second-month Passover opportunity

The gall and the sour wine:

📖Psa 69:21  And they gave me gall/ ראשׁ  H7219 Rosh for my food, And for my thirst they gave me vinegar/ חמץ chomets H2558 to drink. 

In Psalm 69:21 the Hebrew word רֹאשׁ (rosh) is used, but here it doesn’t mean “head” — it’s a homonym in Hebrew. We saw the plant life was created on Day 3 of creation and this species of rosh poison offering mixed with gall to Yahusha signifies the death it brings -trying to disqualify His death and resurrection.

Here rosh means a bitter, poisonous plant — often identified with poison hemlock or wormwood — not “head.”

The same word Rosh which means chief of the poisonous plant is used figuratively in Deut 29:18 and translated as gall. Also used in Jer 9:15 figuratively.

But in Yahusha's instance it was literal. The word rosh is translated actually as “poison” or “bitterness.” 

So in Psalm 69:21:

rosh = bitter poison → “They gave me poison for food…”

Prophetic fulfillment: Matthew 27:34 / Mark 15:23 — gall mixed with wine offered to Yahusha.

When we put all four Gospel accounts side by side, it becomes clear that there were two separate drink offerings given to Yahusha on the cross, and that explains why one says He refused and another says He received. This a 4 dimensional view

📖Matthew 27:34 – “They gave him wine mingled with gall to drink; but when he had tasted it, he would not drink.”

📖Mark 15:23 – “They gave him wine mingled with myrrh to drink; but he did not take it.”

This first drink was offered before He was actually crucified or in the early moments.

Gall (Heb. rosh) and myrrh were both bitter — and gall/rosh in Psalm 69:21 can refer to a poisonous or sedating substance. The Romans sometimes gave this to dull pain (a form of mercy killing), but He refused because He chose to endure the full suffering. Hence, He refused it or it wouldn't serve the whole Atonement purpose He came for. 

📖John 19:28–30 – “Yahusha, knowing that all things were now accomplished, that the Scripture might be fulfilled, said, ‘I thirst.’ … So when Yahusha had received the sour wine, He said, ‘It is finished!’”

Matthew 27:48 / Mark 15:36 – A sponge soaked in sour wine was put on a reed (John says hyssop) and given to Him.

This was hours later, near His final breath.

This sour wine (chometz) on hyssop at the very end wasn’t about a narcotic at all, but a deep prophetic enactment:

Early in the crucifixion, they offered wine mixed with gall/myrrh (Matthew 27:34, Mark 15:23) — a sedative or poison — and He refused it, because He would not dull His senses nor hasten His death.

Hours later, John 19:28–30 shows Him receiving the chometz, after declaring “I thirst,” fulfilling scripture, and immediately saying “It is finished.”

The hyssop detail (John 19:29) ties directly to Torah cleansing rituals:

Passover — blood applied with hyssop to doorposts (Ex 12:22)

Leper cleansing — hyssop with water and blood (Lev 14:4)

Red Heifer water — for purification from death (Num 19:18)

💦⚠️Bitter water of jealously: 

Bitter water of jealousy — priest gives the suspected bride water mixed with dust from the tabernacle floor (Num 5:11–31)

Yahusha, as the husband, is treated as if He were the suspected unfaithful wife — bearing the curse in our place. He drinks the “bitter water” so that His bride (YasharEL) is vindicated and set free.

📖Psalm 51:7 – David cries, “Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean” — immediately after confessing adultery with Bathsheba.

David had been “exposed” for adultery by Nathan, much like an accused wife in Numbers 5.

He invokes hyssop — not because the Torah said “use hyssop for jealousy water”, but because Hyssop symbolized applying cleansing water to defiled persons. He saw himself as the unfaithful partner who needed the priestly application of purification and that priest he was calling upon in Ruach was Yahusha but with his understanding of Torah as hyssop as a application agent for his cleansing..

📖Num 5:17  And the priest shall take set-apart water in an earthen vessel, and take some of the dust that is on the floor of the Dwelling Place and put it into the water. 

👁️The typography is embedded in the context:

The set part water many say is from the basin besides the bronze altar used for washing of animal sacrifices etc. But we saw the context that In Numbers 19, the mei niddah (water of separation) from the ashes of the parah adumah (red heifer) is specifically prescribed for removing the defilement of death — and priests, by the nature of their work, were constantly in contact with the dead bodies of sacrificial animals.

If they were to remain ritually clean while handling sacrificial pieces, they couldn’t just wash with ordinary water. The set apart water for certain ritual uses — such as in Numbers 5 for the bitter water of jealousy — would make the most sense if it was drawn from a source already sanctified and capable of cleansing from corpse defilement.

📖Numbers 19:9 "And a man that is clean shall gather up the ashes of the heifer, and lay them up outside the camp in a clean place, and it shall be kept for the congregation of the children of Yisrael for a water of purification; it is for sin."

From this, the Mishnah (Parah 3:11) and later Jewish tradition teach that:

  • The ashes were divided into three parts:

    1. One kept on the Temple Mount for priestly use.

    2. One kept on the Mount of Olives for ritual use for outcasts as lepers, people with skin diseases etc.

    3. One kept in a special guarded location as a memorial and reserve.

  • These ashes were mixed with living water (spring water) to make the “water of purification” for cleansing from corpse defilement (Num 19:17).

The rabbinic record even claims that a very small amount of ash from each previous red heifer was added to the ashes of the next one, making a continuous chain from Moses onward.

Otherwise, the priest himself could have been rendered tamei (unclean) and disqualified from performing the test of jealousy or other duties.

However, there’s a nuance:

  • Rabbinic tradition makes a distinction between human corpse impurity (טומאת מת) and the impurity from touching slaughtered sacrificial animals. They say latter didn’t require the red heifer water — it could be resolved by simple washing and waiting until evening (Leviticus 11:39–40).

  • But the deeper symbolic reading — which traced with Yahusha — collapses that separation. Spiritually, death is death, whether animal or man. In that light, the “bronze basin” (כיור נחשת) between the altar and the Tent of Meeting (Exodus 30:18–21) could indeed be seen as the station where priests washed hands and feet with water would have included the ashes of the red heifer, which Rabbinic tradition diluted the understanding of the requirement of the law.

That would mean:

  • The bronze basin points to ongoing purification in the priestly service.

  • The stored ashes show there was always provision for true cleansing from death-contact.

  • Yahusha, as the Melchizedek priest, bypasses the whole cycle — His own blood and water cleanse fully without hyssop or red heifer water.

And if that’s the case, the bitter water of jealousy would be doubly significant:

It contained set apart water associated with cleansing death.

It had dust from the Tabernacle floor — symbolizing humility and mortality.

The hyssop connection (Psalm 51:7) becomes a silent emblem of both cleansing from sin and the removal of death’s stain.

🔩Here’s how the connections align:

1. Passover Lamb (Exodus 12:22)

Hyssop dipped in lamb’s blood applied to the wood of the doorposts. The wood pointing to the stake.

Protection from the Destroyer — not just symbolic cleansing, but covenant covering.

2. Red Heifer (Numbers 19:6)

Burned with cedar wood (a durable wood, pointing to the tree/cross), hyssop (application), and scarlet (blood imagery and thread of redemption pointing to Messiah).

Ashes mixed with living water for purification from death — especially relevant for priests dealing with sacrificial carcasses.

3. Cleansing of the Leper (Leviticus 14:4–7)

Cedar, scarlet, hyssop again — one bird slain over living water, the other set free — resurrection imagery.

The living water cannot be ordinary water. It had to be set part. The priests were dealing with dead portions of skin on a leper.

🔍Let’s examine Miryam’s leprosy:

See what Aharon said of his sister 

📖Num 12:12  “Please do not let her be as one dead when coming out of his mother's womb, with his flesh half consumed!” 

Her flesh was half consumed as lepers were treated as dead coz they were always outside the camp and were cut off. The readmission was mercy shown.

📖Num 12:13  And Mosheh cried out to יהוה, saying, “O Ěl, please heal her, please!”
📖Num 12:14  And יהוה said to Mosheh, “If her father had but spit in her face, would she not be ashamed seven days? Let her be shut out of the camp seven days, and after that let her be readmitted.”
📖Num 12:15  And Miryam was shut out of the camp seven days, and the people did not set out until Miryam was readmitted.

📖Job 18:13  It devours parts of his skin, the first-born of death devours his parts. 

The priest, in the cleansing ritual, would handle the dead skin and necrotic tissue that symbolically represented death.

This is the same defilement type that Numbers 19 addresses with the red heifer water.

Leviticus 14 and Numbers 19 share the same triple-symbol set:

Cedar wood → endurance / the “tree” (stake) / incorruptibility.

Scarlet → blood / atonement covering (thread of redemption pointing to Messiah).

Hyssop → application of cleansing to the sinner.

All three also appear in Numbers 19:6 (red heifer ashes ritual) — strongly linking the two ceremonies.

“Living water” in Torah context

Mayim chayim (“living water”) always refers to flowing, spring, or fresh water.

In purification from death, it had to be mixed with ashes of the red heifer (Numbers 19:17).

That’s why the priest in Leviticus 14 likely used the same — because he was cleansing what was regarded as “death” from the leper.

⭐Prophetic picture

Bird slain over living water → Yahusha’s death in union with the Spirit (“living water” — John 7:38–39).

Second bird set free → Resurrection and ascension.

Cedar + scarlet + hyssop → cross + blood + applied cleansing.

All done with water that had touched ashes → His death’s power applied to cleanse death from us.

4. Psalm 51:7

David’s plea: “Cleanse me with hyssop, and I will be clean” — directly invoking the red heifer and Passover cleansing imagery.


5. Impaling on stake (John 19:29)

Hyssop lifts sour wine (chometz) to Yahusha’s lips — the impurity of sin and death brought to Him, and He “takes it” so we can be cleansed.

The dust and filth around the execution site completes the picture of Him bearing our uncleanness.

When we see hyssop appear, it’s never random — it’s the covenant application tool, always bridging blood/water to the object or person being cleansed.

The “silence” in Numbers 5 bitter water of jealousy is actually prophetic subtlety — the hyssop is there by principle, even if not mentioned, because the priest is applying water for judgment/cleansing from the altar

Under the Levitical priesthood, every transfer of cleansing (whether bitter water, red heifer water, leper cleansing, or corpse purification) required a mediating implement like hyssop, cedar, or scarlet to apply the purifying water or blood, because the priest himself could be rendered unclean by direct contact. The hyssop was the “safe distance” applicator.

💖But Yahusha, as the Malchitsedeq priest (Hebrews 7:26–28), is categorically different:

He is undefilable — set apart flows outward from Him rather than being diminished by uncleanness (cf. Luke 8:43–48, the woman with the issue of blood).

When He touches a leper (Mark 1:40–42), He does not become unclean; rather, the leper becomes clean instantly.

📖Mrk 1:40  And a leper came to Him, calling upon Him, kneeling down to Him and saying to Him, “If You desire, You are able to make me clean.”
📖Mrk 1:41  And יהושע, moved with compassion, stretched out His hand and touched him, and said to him, “I desire it. Be cleansed.”
📖Mrk 1:42  And immediately the leprosy left him, and he was cleansed.

When He allows an unclean woman to touch His garment, instead of contamination passing to Him, power passes from Him to her.

Even in death (Luke 7:14–15, Jairus’s daughter; John 11:43–44, Lazarus), His touch brings life rather than incurring corpse-uncleanness.

This is prophetic reversal:

In Torah law, uncleanness is contagious, set apartness is localized.

In Yahusha, set apartness is contagious, uncleanness is powerless.

So the hyssop — the careful mediator — is no longer necessary for Him, because He Himself is the Living Water and the purifying Blood (John 19:34), applied without any instrument.

Under the Torah, a Levitical priest could not bypass the hyssop or the mediating ritual. Any contact with uncleanness (corpse, leper, issue of blood) required a cleansing process, because uncleanness was transferred to the one touching. The hyssop with blood and water (often from the red heifer mixture) was the mediator — a symbol of something external applying Yahuah’s cleansing.

But Yahusha, as the Malchitsedeq High Priest (Hebrews 7:23–28), operates on an entirely different plane:

1.He is the source of the cleansing — The Levitical priest carried clean water; Yahusha is the fountain of living waters (Jeremiah 2:13, John 7:37–39).

2.He is never defiled — Instead of uncleanness transferring to Him, His purity transfers to the unclean (Mark 1:40–42 with the leper; Luke 8:43–48 with the woman with the issue of blood). In both cases, His set apartness overpowered the defilement — reversing the Levitical flow.

3.No hyssop required — The hyssop in the Torah was a prophetic pointer to Him. On the cross, when given the sour wine on a hyssop stalk (John 19:29), the “shadow” met the “substance.” Once the true cleansing power had come, the physical plant was no longer necessary.

4.Prophetic enactment in the Gospels — Every time Yahusha touched or allowed Himself to be touched by an “unclean” person, it was a prophetic declaration that the Malchitsedeq priesthood was here — one in which the High Priest’s set-apartness is stronger than any defilement.

The imagery of the red heifer water, cedar, scarlet, and hyssop is fulfilled in Him, but the application no longer needs a branch — the branch Himself (Isaiah 11:1) applies His own cleansing directly.

Under the Torah, priestly purity was safeguarded by elaborate cleansing laws. When a priest came into contact with death, disease, or bodily emissions, they required rituals such as the sprinkling of red heifer water (Numbers 19) or the application of hyssop with blood over “living water” (Leviticus 14). These served as barriers between the holy and the unclean — both to prevent ritual defilement of the sanctuary and to teach Israel about the deadly separation caused by sin.

Yahusha, however, is not merely another Levitical priest. He is the eternal Malchitsedeq priest — one who embodies life itself and is undefilable by death or impurity. His priesthood is not dependent on the cleansing of the red heifer’s ashes, hyssop branches, or running water, because He is the fountain of living waters (Jeremiah 2:13; John 4:14). When He touches the unclean, He is not made unclean — instead, His set-apartness flows outward, cleansing the unclean.

The woman with the issue of blood for twelve years (Luke 8:43–48) illustrates this reversal perfectly. Under Torah, her touch should have made Him unclean (Leviticus 15:25–27). Yet, when she touched the kanaf (corner/hem) of His garment — a place tied to the tzitzit and the Name of Yahuah — instead of transmitting impurity, power went out from Him into her. She was healed instantly, and He remained pure.

Similarly, Yahusha touched lepers (Matthew 8:3), paralytics (John 5:8–9), and even the dead (Luke 7:14; Mark 5:41). In each case, instead of contracting ritual uncleanness, He transmitted resurrection life. This overturns the Levitical pattern: the Levitical priest is protected from impurity; the Malchitsedeq priest is the conqueror of impurity.

In this way, all the Torah rituals — the hyssop, cedar, scarlet, red heifer ashes, living water — were prophetic shadows. They were physical mediators for the Levitical priesthood, but Yahusha is the spiritual fulfillment. He does not need an external instrument to apply His own blood and water. His own person is the temple, the altar, the sacrifice, and the priest — all in one.

This is why He could sit and eat with tax collectors and sinners (Mark 2:15–17), enter the homes of the ritually unclean (Luke 19:5–7), and let unclean women touch Him — because His priesthood is not one of protection from contamination, but of purification by contact. He is not a priest who needs hyssop to sprinkle cleansing water; He is the source from which all cleansing flows.

🧮Finally gematria of azub 

1. Hyssop (אזוב = 16)

Aleph (א) = 1 → the heavenly man, the beginning.

Zayin (ז) = 7 → covenant weapon, cutting, separating between clean/unclean.

Vav (ו) = 6 → the nail, connection between heaven and earth.

Beit (ב) = 2 → the house, dwelling place.

Total = 16 → symbol of completion of becoming in the sense of cleansing or transition.

Hyssop is the tool for application of blood and water in Torah (Exodus 12:22, Psalm 51:7, John 19:29).

2. Yahuah (יהוה)

Split as Ya-huah → the second half huah (הוה) = 5 + 6 + 5 = 16.

הוה means to become, to come into being.

This is the active, creative aspect of His name — the One who causes to exist.

So, 16 is the number of becoming/manifestation from the invisible to the visible.

3. The link

Hyssop (16) is the instrument through which cleansing brings a person into the state of becoming new — manifesting the work of Yahuah’s name (huah = 16).

In Exodus, hyssop applied the Passover blood → the people became redeemed.

In purification rituals, hyssop applied water/blood to the unclean → they became clean.

In Messiah, there was no need for hyssop because He Himself is the Aleph (1) — the heavenly man — and the Yod (10), the invisible hand of power, who causes the becoming (huah = 16) by His own word and touch.

4. The first part of Yahuah’s name when Aleph is added: 

איה = א (1) + י (10) + ה (5) = 16.H346

In biblical  איה functions as the interrogative “Where?” — the searching question (e.g., “אַיֶּה” in Genesis 3:9 “Where are you?”).

It can also serve poetically as “where is Yah?” — so it fits the theme “Where is Yahuah?”

🔌The tight connection to the 16-cluster:

איה (16) — the question: “Where?” (Where is the salvation? Where is Yahuah manifested?)

אזוב (16) — the instrument: hyssop, the applicator of blood/water.

הוה (16) — the verb/act: “to become” / “to come into being” (the active sense inside Yahuah’s name).

בהובא (16) — the moment: “when it was brought” (the act of application / bringing)

The hyssop touching Yahusha’s lips is where the shadow met the Substance — the earthly emblem meeting the Heavenly Reality.”

3️⃣Here’s how the triple-16 meets Yahusha at the cross:

When they lifted the hyssop (אזוב = 16) to His lips, it was not just fulfilling a random detail — it was the shadow meeting the substance.

אהי (I will be = 16) — The eternal self-existence of the “I AM” in Exodus 3:14.

אהי (’Ehyeh) is the imperfect (or “prefix-conjugation”) form of the Hebrew verb היה (hayah, “to be”), first person singular.

That form literally means:

  • “I will be” (future sense)

  • It can also carry a present-continuous nuance in Biblical Hebrew, so in context it may mean “I am (being)” or “I will continue to be”.

It’s the same root and form used in אהיה אשר אהיה (Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh) in Shemot/Exodus 3:14 — “I will be what I will be.”

הוה (to become = 16) — The prophetic declaration that the I AM would become flesh and dwell among us.

אזוב (hyssop = 16) — The symbol of cleansing from sin and death, used in Passover, the red heifer water, and leper purification.

At that moment on the cross, the “I AM” who became flesh allowed the hyssop — the ritual instrument of cleansing — to touch His lips.

It was like heaven’s seal saying:

“I AM (אהי = 16), I have become (הוה = 16), and I cleanse (אזוב = 16).”

The priests in the shadow had to apply hyssop dipped in sacrificial blood to others.

Yahusha, the Malchitsedeq Priest, didn’t need someone else to apply it to Him — He was both the Priest and the Offering, and the hyssop in that moment testified that His blood is the true purification.

Summary

  • Hyssop in Scripture:

    • Exodus 12:22: Used to apply lamb’s blood on doorposts during Passover, protecting Israel from the Destroyer and symbolizing covenant covering.

    • Leviticus 14:4–7: Employed in the leper’s cleansing ritual with cedar wood, scarlet, and living water, signifying restoration from a state of “social death.”

    • Numbers 19:6, 18: Integral to the red heifer ritual, where hyssop applies purifying water to cleanse corpse impurity, addressing the ultimate defilement of death.

  • Symbolic Role:

    • Hyssop serves as a ritual “sprinkler,” preventing direct contact with sacred blood or water, maintaining priestly purity.

    • Represents the application of cleansing, connecting the impure to Yahuah’s provision for set-apartness.

  • Red Heifer Ritual (Numbers 19):

    • Ashes of the red heifer, mixed with living water (from Gihon Spring in Temple times), purify those defiled by death.

    • Involves a paradoxical impurity: the clean person administering the ritual becomes temporarily unclean.

    • Symbolizes Messiah’s sacrifice, cleansing from death’s defilement (Hebrews 9:13–14).

  • Prophetic Fulfillment in Yahusha:

    • John 19:29: Hyssop lifts sour wine to Yahusha’s lips at the crucifixion, uniting Passover, leper cleansing, and red heifer imagery.

    • Yahusha, as the Melchizedek Priest, is undefilable, cleansing others without needing hyssop Himself (Mark 1:40–42; Luke 8:43–48).

    • His blood and water (John 19:34) fulfill the red heifer’s purification, rendering Torah rituals obsolete.

  • Day 1–3–7 Pattern:

    • Passover: Day 1 (blood applied), Day 3 (resurrection), Day 7 (Sabbath rest, pointing to Shavuot).

    • Leper Cleansing: Day 1 (initial cleansing), Day 7 (shaving, restoration to camp), Day 8 (full covenant renewal).

    • Red Heifer: Day 1 (defilement), Day 3 (first sprinkling), Day 7 (final cleansing), symbolizing salvation and final redemption.

  • Gematria of Hyssop (אזוב = 16):

    • Aleph (1) + Zayin (7) + Vav (6) + Beit (2) = 16, symbolizing completion and becoming new.

    • Links to Yahuah’s name (הוה = 16, “to become”) and איה (16, “where is Yah?”), tying hyssop to divine manifestation.

    • At the cross, hyssop (16) meets Yahusha, the “I AM” (אהי = 16), embodying the cleansing and becoming of redemption.

  • Crucifixion Context:

    • Priests at Golgotha, near Yahusha’s body, incurred corpse defilement (Numbers 19:14–16), disqualifying them from Passover unless purified.

    • Their focus on avoiding Pilate’s hall (John 18:28) ignored the greater defilement, missing the true cleansing through Yahusha’s blood.

    • The sour wine on hyssop (John 19:29) and gall (Psalm 69:21) fulfill Torah rituals, with Yahusha bearing the “bitter water” of jealousy (Numbers 5) for His bride, YasharEL.

  • Theological Significance:

    • Hyssop’s role in Torah rituals (Passover, leper, red heifer) foreshadows Yahusha’s direct cleansing as the Melchizedek Priest.

    • His priesthood reverses Torah’s contagion of uncleanness, making set-apartness contagious (e.g., healing lepers, raising the dead).

    • The hyssop at the cross marks the moment where the shadow (ritual) meets the substance (Messiah), completing the redemptive narrative.

Monday, August 4, 2025

The 4 Dimensional View

 

Preface

The exploration of biblical symbolism, particularly the imagery of the cherubim with their four faces and the four rivers flowing from Eden, unveils a profound tapestry of divine revelation. These images are not mere literary flourishes but intricate patterns woven into Scripture to convey the multidimensional nature of Yahuah’s truth. The following note delves into these symbols, revealing how they reflect a singular divine source expressed through four distinct perspectives, each carrying the same spiritual DNA. By examining key events—such as the fourfold accounts of Yahusha’s anointing, resurrection, feeding of the 5,000, baptism, triumphal entry, and Shaul’s Damascus vision—alongside the visions of Ezekiel, Daniel, YashaYahu, and John, we uncover a unified narrative. These accounts, though varied in detail, harmonize to present Yahusha as King, Servant, Man, and Priest, countering the distortions of the adversary who seeks to obscure this four-dimensional revelation. This study invites readers to discern the Ruach-inspired unity beneath the surface, connecting Torah, prophecy, and the Basharah to reveal the fullness of the Messiah’s identity and purpose. Lets begin!

When we read scriptures we come across the appearance of cherubims with 4 faces and with the description given, we wonder how terrifying their description is. We fail to realize that these creatures are symbolic and hold a pattern which needs to be decoded with the help of the Ruach. The DNA of the structure is the same but is portrayed in 4 different dimensional view.

📖 Genesis 2:10 "And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from there it was parted, and became four heads."

💧 The Pattern: One River → Four Heads

  • One Source: A single river flows out of Eden—which represents the presence of Yahuah, the dwelling of divine life.

  • Four Heads: It divides into four separate heads (ראשים, roshim), going in different directions but from the same river, the same water, the same DNA.

  • This is exactly what we see in the four Gospel accounts, or the four accounts of Paul’s Damascus experience and so forth:

One divine event (river) → Four expressions/testimonies (heads),
All sharing the same spiritual origin, but flowing in different directions for different purposes.

📖 Genesis 2:10–14 – The Four Rivers

“And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from there it divided and became four heads.

 

The name of the first is Pishon...
The name of the second is Gihon...
The name of the third is Hiddekel...

And the fourth river is Perat (Euphrates).”

🌊 1. PISHON (פישון)


📖Genesis 2:11 "The name of the first is Pishon; it flows around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold..." 

🔍 Meaning:

  • Root likely from פוש (push) or פשה (pashah), meaning "to spring forth, to scatter, to spread."

  • Meaning: "Spreader", "Overflowing", or "Increasing".

🌍 Geography:

  • Havilah = land known for gold, bdellium, and onyx. Often associated with Arabia or NE Africa.

✨ Prophetic Meaning:

  • Abundance, provision, richness in spiritual inheritance.

  • Symbolizes fruitfulness, overflowing blessing— linked to the Gospel of Matthew (Kingdom wealth, royal lineage).

  • Could represent the spreading of the Word outward from Eden—a missionary reach.

🌊 2. GIHON (גיחון)


📖 Genesis 2:13 "The name of the second river is Gihon; it flows around the whole land of Cush." 

🔍 Meaning:

  • From the root גיח (giyach) = "to gush forth, burst out."

  • Gihon = "Gushing", "Breaking out", or "Bursting forth".

🌍 Geography:

  • Cush = ancient Ethiopia/Sudan region. It was a spring near Yerushalayim (the Gihon Spring, where Solomon was anointed).

✨ Prophetic Meaning:

  • Deliverance, intercession, and life out of death.

  • Often associated with the Spirit breaking forth—linked to Mark’s Gospel (power/action).

  • Also tied to anointing and priesthood, as Solomon was anointed at the Gihon (1 Kings 1:38–45).

📖1Ki 1:38  Then Tsaḏoq the priest, and Nathan the prophet, and Benayahu son of Yehoyaḏa, and the Kerěthites, and the Pelěthites went down and had Shelomoh ride on Sovereign Dawiḏ’s mule, and took him to Giḥon. 
📖1Ki 1:39  And Tsaḏoq the priest took a horn of oil from the Tent and anointed Shelomoh. And they blew with the shophar, and all the people said, “Let Sovereign Shelomoh live!” 

🌊 3. HIDDEKEL (הדקל)

📖Genesis 2:14 "The name of the third river is Hiddekel; it goes east of Asshur." 

🔍 Meaning:

  • Ancient name for the Tigris River.

  • Possibly from חד (chad) = sharp, and קל (qal) = swift.

  • Hiddekel = "Rapid", "Sharp Voice", or "Swift Stream".

🌍 Geography:

  • East of Asshur (Assyria). Modern Tigris River in Mesopotamia.

✨ Prophetic Meaning:

  • Speed, judgment, prophetic precision, clarity of truth.

  • Symbolizes the sharp, clear Word—tying to Luke’s Basharah/Gospel, focused on order and human intervention.

📖Luk 1:3  it seemed good to me as well, having followed up all these matters exactly from the beginning, to write to you an orderly account, most excellent Theophilos, 

It also ties to Shaul's 4 accounts of appearance of Yahusha in a 4 dimensional view as Luke again mentions the witness to Theophilos in Acts 3 times & Shaul himself testifies of him receiving the revelation of Yahusha without human intervention to the Galatians assembly. (Gal 1:11-17).

📖Acts 1:1  The first account I made, O Theophilos,a of all that יהושע began both to do and to teach,  

📖Gal 1:11  And I make known to you, brothers, that the Good News announced by me is not according to man. 
📖Gal 1:12  For I did not receive it from man, nor was I taught it, but through a revelation of יהושע Messiah. 
📖Gal 1:13  For you have heard of my former behaviour in Yehuḏaism, how intensely I persecuted the assembly of Elohim, and ravaged it. 
📖Gal 1:14  And I progressed in Yehuḏaism beyond many of my age in my race, being more exceedingly ardent for the traditions of my fathers. 
📖Gal 1:15  But when it pleased Elohim, who separated me from my mother’s womb and called me by His favour, 
📖Gal 1:16  to reveal His Son in me, that I might bring Him, the Good News, to the nations, I did not immediately consult with flesh and blood, 
📖Gal 1:17  neither did I go up to Yerushalayim, to those who were emissaries before me. But I went to Araḇia, and returned again to Dammeseq. 

🔍 Historical/Theological Possibilities of Theophilos

1. A Real Person of High Status

  • The title "κράτιστε" (kratiste) used in Luke 1:3 means "most excellent"—a formal Roman title of honor.

  • This suggests Theophilos was likely a real, high-ranking Roman official or nobleman.

  • He may have been a Roman governor or judge, possibly someone involved in Shaul's trials.

    • 🧩 Meaning of the Name

Θεόφιλος (Theophilos) is a Greek name meaning "Friend of Elohim" or "Beloved of Elohim."

  • θεός (Theos) = Elohim

  • φίλος (philos) = friend / lover

Hiddekel ties to Assyria (symbol of exile and return), suggesting a call to repentance and a plea to set the captives of Yahuah free.

🌊 4. PERAT (פרת) – Euphrates


📖 Genesis 2:14 "And the fourth river is Perat." 

🔍 Meaning:

  • Hebrew Perat = Euphrates.

  • May derive from פרה (parah) = "to be fruitful, to increase".

  • Name could mean: "Fruitfulness", "Abundance", "Breakthrough".

🌍 Geography:

  • Euphrates = major river in Mesopotamia, the eastern boundary of the Promised Land (cf. Genesis 15:18).

  • In later Scripture, often seen as a boundary between the nations and the people of Yahuah.

✨ Prophetic Meaning:

  • Represents boundary, warfare, inheritance.

  • Often connected to final judgment and release (see Revelation 9:14) as the unclean nations breach the boundary and come within YasharEL.

📖 Rev 9:14  saying to the sixth messenger who had the trumpet, “Release the four messengers, those having been bound at the great river Euphrates.” 

  • Linked with Yahuchanan’s (John's) Gospel, which reveals the deep mysteries and spiritual boundaries—from the Garden to the New Yerushalayim, as Yahuchanan writes the entire account showing the end in imageries (in book of Revelation).

🕊️ Spiritual Insight

These rivers, while literal, also represent the fourfold flow of life and revelation from the dwelling place of Elohim to the nations:

  • From Eden (Presence)

  • To the Garden (Fellowship)

  • To the Ends of the Earth (Witness)

They mirror:

  • Four faces of the cherubim

  • Four Bashara's/Gospels

  • Four corners of the earth

  • Four aspects of Mashiyach

Each river offers a different stream of the same water of life—flowing outward from the source of all things to bring back His remnant into the DNA of the source through witness.

River Meaning Geography Prophetic Role Gospel Parallel
Pishon Spreading, Overflow Havilah (Arabia/Africa) Prosperity, Kingdom wealth Matthew – King
Gihon Gushing forth Cush (Ethiopia) Anointing, Deliverance Mark – Servant
Hiddekel Swift, Sharp Voice East of Assyria Captivity and plea of release, Truth Luke & Acts of the Apostles – Man
Perat Fruitfulness Euphrates (Mesopotamia) Inheritance, Final boundaries John – Son of Elohim

🐍The Beast/Living Creature comes into the imagery to deceive:

Daniel’s Vision of Four Beasts (Daniel 7)

📖 Daniel 7:1–8

  • Description:

    • Each represents kingdoms tied to the DNA of ha shatan's kingdom, contrast to living creatures like cherubim whose DNA is tied to Mashiyach.

    • These beasts are typologically linked to the four faces in Ezekiel (especially in apocalyptic/dark interpretations bringing in another outcome).

  • Daniel sees four great beasts rising from the sea—lion, bear, leopard, and a terrifying beast.

  • These beasts come within to deceive by showing contradiction in a first blush meaning (concealing the true revelation , thus replacing the four faces into wildness (as all beasts Daniel saw were wild beasts)


🗣️The Four Faces:

Prophet Reference Creatures Faces Notes
Ezekiel Ezekiel 1 & 10 4 living creatures (cherubim) 4 per creature (man, lion, ox, eagle) Vision of the esteem of Yahuah by the River Kebar
Isaiah Isaiah 6 Seraphim Not specified Temple vision; they cry “Set-Apart, Set-Apart, Set-Apart"
Daniel Daniel 7 4 beasts Individual symbolic faces Represent 4 kingdoms of the earth bringing counterfeit meaning/dark saying 
John Revelation 4 4 living creatures 1 face each (man, lion, calf, eagle) Around the throne in heaven

🧩 The Comparisons?

Attribute Ezekiel 1 & 10      Revelation 4 Match?
Number of creatures     4         4                                                              ✅
Faces per      creature     4 faces per  creature          1 face per   creature  🟡 Different form, same  function
Types of faces Man, Lion, Ox, Eagle   Man, Lion, Calf,  Eagle  🟡  (Ox = Calf)
Wings 4 wings (Ezek 1:6), 2 covering    6 wings  🟡 Slightly different. The number 6 represents man. In Revelation 4, man holds the revelation.
Eyes Under wings (Ezek 10:12)  All over, front and back                                      🟡Eyes show the revelation/revealing. Under the wings = Under the throne. All over, front and back = Around the throne
Position Under the throne of Elohim Around the throne   🟡Under the throne pointing to earth with Yahusha as King over it, around the throne is the 4 view dimension of the throne
Function Bearers of the throne, moving by Ruach Declare set-apartness, worship in Ruach  ✅ Yahuah = Yahusha as the throne moved  to Galgal (Wheel in their hearing). Eze 10:13

🕊️ Harmony in Difference:

  • Ezekiel saw each cherub with all four faces which shows the completeness and multi-dimensionality of Elohim's revelation.

  • John saw four separate creatures, each emphasizing one face—more like the 4 banners around the tabernacle (Yahudah = Lion, Ephraim = Ox, Reuben = Man, Dan = Eagle).

  • Ox (שור) and Calf (עגל) are closely related—both representing service, sacrifice, and firstborn strength.

Direction Tribe Banner Scripture Face (Tradition / Prophetic) Additional Source
East Yahudah Numbers 2:3 Lion (lion's whelp) Genesis 49:9
South Reuben  Numbers 2:10 Man (Reuben: See a Son. Human frailty, natural strength, and the firstborn of man.) Genesis 49:3
West Ephraim Numbers 2:18   Ox Debarim 33:17 (“His splendour is like a first-born bull)
North Dan Numbers 2:25 Eagle /Serpent -preys upon others Genesis 49:17

(Note: Please read the scriptures used as cross references).

🌱Dan is termed as lion's whelp leaping from Bashan in Deut 33:22:

📖 Deuteronomy 33:22 "And of Dan he said: Dan is a lion’s whelp; he leaps from Bashan."

🧩 Paradox in the Language:

  1. “Lion’s whelp” (גור אריה) = strength, royal potential, like Yahudah (Genesis 49:9)
    → Suggests noble beginnings, courage, or judicial role

  2. “Leaps from Bashan” = surprise attack from an unexpected or elevated region
    → Yet Dan was not given Bashan, and Bashan is linked to rebellion, high places, and enemies of Yahuah

This sets up a paradox:

  • Dan is presented like Yahudah (lion)…

  • But acts from a place associated with rebellion (Bashan)…

  • Echoing his earlier comparison to a serpent (Genesis 49:17)

🐍🔁 Dan: From Judge to Predator?

📖 Genesis 49:16–17 “Dan shall judge his people… He shall be a serpent by the way…”

  • He begins as a judge, but ends up like a venomous serpent.

  • This dual identity is echoed again in Deuteronomy 33:22.

  • In prophetic symbolism, serpent and eagle are both predators — but one crawls low, and the other watches from above.

While Torah doesn’t directly call Dan an eagle, Ezekiel 1 & Revelation 4 replace the serpent with the eagle as the fourth face.

Some interpretations suggest:

  • The eagle is a redeemed form of the serpent — same striking ability, but now from heavenly perspective, not dust.

  • Dan's transformation from earth-bound serpent to sky-soaring eagle is possible—but only through redemption.

Yet in Revelation 7:

  • Dan is omitted from the tribes sealed as 144,000.

  • Possibly due to idolatry (cf. Judges 18; 1 Kings 12:30 – golden calf in Dan).

So instead of leaping on behalf of Yahuah’s people, Dan may be seen as leaping upon them — from a high place (Bashan), acting like an eagle, but not of the Ruach.

🦅 The Eagle’s Face – Dimension Behind the Throne

In both Ezekiel 1:10 and Revelation 4:7, one of the four faces is that of an eagle:

 פני נשר – "Face of an eagle"

This face isn’t facing forward or to the sides — it represents the dimension behind the throne, the invisible heavenly realm, the mystery of divinity, and eternal spirit.

Symbol Meaning
🦅 Eagle Prophetic vision, soaring in heaven, divine perspective
Eyesight Sees far above natural view — heavenly insight
Dwelling Builds nest on high — throne language (see Obadiah 1:4)
Movement Swift, directed by Ruach — cf. Deut 32:11, Isa 40:31
Location Often in Scripture, eagle descends from above — unseen

🟡 Spiritual dimension: The eagle represents the unseen, the heavenly, the Ruach realm — the invisible forces behind Yahuah’s judgments and acts which we can't see unless we receive the eyes as seen on the cherubs wings all around.

🌴Basharah/Gospel Face Mapping (Traditional and Prophetic):

Gospel Face Tribe  Theme of Messiah
Matthew 🦁 Lion Yahudah                                            King / Messiah of YasharEL
Mark 🐂 Ox Ephraim                                             Servant / Sacrifice
Luke 👤 Man Reuben                        Son of Man / Humanity in witness standing before Roman (beastly kingdom)-Theophilos
John 🦅 Eagle   Dan                                    Judge/the Atonement Boundary (Limited Atonement). “I pray not for the world, but for those whom You have given Me...” (John 17:9

🐍Satan's forces behind Yahuah's purpose: Denoted by the Eagle's face behind the throne:

📖Job 1:7  And יהוה said to Satan, “From where do you come?” And Satan answered יהוה and said, “From going to and fro/shut שוט H7751 in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.” 

🔹 שוט (shin-uau-tet)

💥 Primary Meaning:

Whip, scourge, or lash — a tool used for punishment or driving animals.

📖 Examples:

  • משל שוטים (mashal shotim) – a proverb of whips (1 Kings 12:11, referring to Rehoboam saying he will chastise with whips).

  • שוט סופרים – a scribe's whip, symbol of discipline or correction.


Hebrew Meaning Usage
שוט (to roam)    To go about, travel, wander           Job 1:7, 2:2
שוט (whip)        A whip or scourge       1 Kings 12:11, Isaiah 10:26

📚 Other uses of שׁוּט (to roam):

  • 2 Chronicles 16:9 – “The eyes of Yahuah roam ( שוטים) throughout the whole earth…”

  • Amos 8:12 – “They shall wander (ושטטו) from sea to sea…”


🌀Job 1:7 On the surface:
  • Satan is moving restlessly throughout “the earth.”

🕊 On the prophetic layer:

  • Satan is strategically operating within ארץ (arets)— the land — not just the physical earth, but YasharEL — the place where Yahuah chose to place His Name, His Throne, and His people.

📖 Tehillim 83:4"Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Yisrael may be no more in remembrance."

He isn’t wandering for fun. He’s hunting to corrupt, accuse, and enslave Yahuah’s chosen ones through spiritual oppression.  

🐍 Hidden Link: שוט (roaming) ↔ שוט (whip)

Even though שׁוּט (to roam) and שׁוֹט (whip) are different grammatical forms, our observation is prophetically legitimate when we see:

👁 He roams (שוט)

to find weak points, openings, breaches.

🪓 Then he strikes — not physically, but with:

  • accusation

  • deception

  • oppression (שוט as whip)

  • false teaching

  • idolatry

  • fear

📖 Proverbs 26:3“A whip (שוט) is for the horse… and a rod for the fool's back.”

 🏔 Prophetic Echo:

Satan’s roaming is strategic warfare — centered on the land of YasharEL and its destiny:

  • to weaken the elect

  • to accuse the righteous

  • to spiritually enslave YasharEL again — like in Mitsrayim

  • to delay or prevent the Kingdom from being revealed on earth

📖 Revelation 12:13 — “And when the dragon saw that he had been cast to the earth, he persecuted the woman who had brought forth the man-child.”

Satan thinks he is doing his own free will but doesn't realise that he is fallen into Yahuah's will to accomplish His plan. The eagle face behind shows us the bird's eye view of  revelation and how it is distorted, who is behind all this, and only the elect will know.

📜 1. The Tablets Written “Zemizeh U'mizeh” – Inside and Outside

📖 Shemot (Exodus) 32:15  "And Mosheh turned and went down from the mountain, and the two tablets of the testimony were in his hand: the tablets were written on both their sides; on the one side (mizeh)  and on the other (u’mizeh) were they written."

🧠 This phrase מזה ומזה (mizeh u'mizeh) doesn’t just mean "front and back" — it also prophetically implies totality, wholeness, or inner and outernothing hidden. And that's exactly what we see in a whole dimensional view through Torah which Satan distorts and twists.

📖 Rev 4:8  And the four living creatures, each having six wings, were covered with eyes around and within. And they do not cease, day or night, saying, “Set-apart, set-apart, set-apart, יהוה Ěl Shaddai,  who was, and who is, and who is coming!” 

These tablets represented:

  • the heart of Yahuah's Torah (תורה)

  • written by the finger of Elohim (not man)

  • bearing covenant and justice

🐍 2. But Hasatan Twists What Is Set-Apart

Satan twists the Torah to enter it, using it as a whip to weaken? And that is exactly how he operates:

📖 2 Corinthians 11:14–15“Even satan masquerades as a messenger of light… his servants as servants of righteousness.”

🧠 Satan doesn’t destroy Torah —

he twists Torah, making it:

  • a weapon of accusation

  • a system of legalism and bondage

  • a means of self-righteousness rather than surrender

This is "the whip" of Torah — the carnal misuse of what was meant to be life.

⚖️ 3. Torah Becomes Death to the Carnal Man

📖 Romans 7:10–11  “And the commandment which was to bring life, I found to bring death. For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it killed me.”

Why?

Because the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life (2 Corinthians 3:6).

🧨 4. This Is the Very Whip Seen

Satan uses the outer Torah, without the inner heart — the "mizeh without the ruach" — to accuse and enslave:

True Torah  Twisted Torah
Life           Death
Spirit Letter
Mercy Condemnation
Covenant Contract
Bride Harlot

The same tablets that were written "mizeh u'mizeh" (fully filled with truth) — when misused — become a snare, a whip, and a trap.

🧠 5. Prophetic Picture: Hasatan Enters the Torah Like a Serpent

Like the nachash in the Garden twisted the word of Elohim, he now enters the Torah — the very words of life — and makes it:

  • a mechanism of control

  • a religious whip

  • a measure of comparison

  • a means of accusation

📖 Revelation 12:10The accuser of our brothers… who accused them before our Elohim day and night…”

✝️ 7. Yahusha Unmasks and Overcomes This Twist

Yahusha fulfilled Torah — not to destroy it, but to restore its inner life.

He didn’t throw away mizeh u'mizeh,
He showed us how it was written by the Ruach, not by whip.

📖 Matthew 5:17 — “I did not come to destroy the Torah or the Prophets but to fulfill…”

📖 Jeremiah 31:33 — “I will write My Torah on their hearts.”

No longer outer law used by Satan as whip

Now, inner Torah sealed by the Ruach, that brings freedom.The tablets written mizeh u'mizeh represent perfect Torah, full and whole and plain. Hasatan is given authority to twist the Torah as a testing of Elohim's people, entering it not by truth, but by carnal enforcement. That twisted Torah becomes a spiritual whip, enslaving carnal YasharEL. Shaul and the apostles warned about this false Torah that brings death. Yahusha restores Torah to its rightful place: written on hearts of His chosen, filled with Ruach.

Revelation 4:8 — the four living creatures, full of eyes round about and within

🔥 Revelation Through Total Visibility: Nothing Hidden


🧱 Tablets written mizeh u'mizeh

  • Front and back

  • Outer and inner

  • Complete revelation

  • No hidden side — everything exposed to the light

  • The Word inscribed entirely by the finger of Elohim

👁 Four Living Creatures covered with eyes “around and within”

  • Perfect vision

  • Full awareness

  • Inside and outside

  • No deception can enter

  • They declare Yahuah’s set-apartness unceasingly — because they see everything as it truly is.

🧠 What This Means Spiritually:

Both symbols (the tablets and the creatures) represent:

Total integrity — inside matches outside

Full awareness — eyes to discern truth

Nothing hidden — neither sin nor esteem

Elohim’s nature revealed without filter

The tablets were perfectly whole — written both sides, just like the creatures are full of eyes both outside and inside — both speak of Elohim’s nature: transparent, set-apart, uncorrupted.

📖 Ezekiel 2:9–10 “I saw a scroll... it was written on the front (paniym פנים H6440) and the behind (achor אחור H268 ), and written on it were lamentations, mourning, and woe.”

Same idea: front and back = full revelation. The Hebrew word for front is paniym which means 'faces' and behind is achor, just as we saw the face of the eagle.
Whether sweet or bitter — nothing hidden. It echoes again in Revelation 10:10 when Yochanan eats the scroll.


פנים — face = open presence, front side
אחור — back = concealed, final, after-part

A judicial record of what He Himself went through and reflects through the faces of the cherubs. This also mirrors the sealed scroll in Revelation 5 that only the Lamb can open — because He alone is worthy to uncover both the faces and the hidden things.

 ⚃ One event 4 accounts recorded in scripture:

🛐1The Four Anointings of Yahusha – Parallel in the 4 Gospels

Basharah Reference Woman Location Body Part Anointed Prophetic Role / Face
Matthew Matt 26:6–13 Unnamed woman Bethany, house of Shim‛on the leper  Head 🦁 King / Messiah of YasharEL (Yahudah)
Mark Mark 14:3–9 Unnamed woman Bethany, house of Shim‛on  the leper            Head 🐂 Servant / Sacrifice (Ephraim)
Luke Luke 7:36–50 A sinful woman (unnamed) house of Shim‛on the Pharisee  Feet 👤 Son of Man / Humanity (Reuben)
John John 12:1–8 Miryam (of Bethany) Bethany, where El‛azar (Lazarus) was            Feet 🦅 Priest / Atonement Boundary (Dan)

🔎 Observations — Verified and Expanded:

1📖John 11:2 explicitly names Miryam

והיא מרים אשר משחה את האדון בשמן וקנחה את רגליו בשערות ראשה
"It was Miryam who anointed the Master with perfume and wiped His feet with her hair…"

John confirms explicitly: this Miryam, sister of El‛azar, is the woman who anointed Yahusha. This is an inspired editorial comment from Yohanan before narrating the event in chapter 12, tying her identity firmly.

2. She anointed both head and feet

  • Matthew and Mark record the head being anointed.

  • Luke and John focus on the feet.

Rather than contradiction, this reveals that Miryam anointed both — and each Basharah emphasizes the part prophetically important to its gospel focus:

  • 👑 Head = Kingly anointing (Matthew, Mark)

  • 🦶 Feet = Humility, priesthood, burial, and devotion (Luke, John)

✅ This supports one woman, one anointing, complete devotion.

3. Miryam chose the feet — a clear spiritual position

📖Luk 10:38  And it came to be as they went that He entered into a certain village. And a certain woman named Martha received Him into her house. 
📖Luk 10:39  And she had a sister called Miryam, who also sat at the feet of יהושע and heard His word. 
📖Luk 10:40  But Martha was distracted with much serving, and coming up she said, “Master, are You not concerned that my sister has left me to serve alone? Speak to her then, to help me.” 
📖Luk 10:41  And יהושע answering, said to her, “Martha, Martha, you are worried and troubled about many matters, 
📖Luk 10:42  but one only is necessary, and Miryam has chosen the good portion, which shall not be taken away from her.”  

Miryam sat at Yahusha’s feet, listening to His word.
Martha was distracted with much serving and asked Messiah to rebuke her — but He praised Miryam’s choice.

✅ This same Miryam, always at Yahusha’s feet, was already modeling deep repentance, humility, and prophetic understanding — a posture also shown in the anointing.

4. All events are in Bethany (בית עניא)

📖Matthew 26:6 – "Now when Yahusha was in Bethany in the house of Shim‛on the leper…"
📖John 12:1 – "Yahusha came to Bethany, where El‛azar was, whom He had raised from the dead."

🟡 It does not say it was El‛azar's/Lazarus house. It says "He came to Bethany, where El‛azar was."

✅ It's entirely possible that:

  • Shim‛on the leper had been healed by Yahusha (hence hosting)

  • El‛azar, Miryam, and Martha were present and even facilitating the gathering

  • This gathering included prominent witnesses of resurrection and healing

🔁 In such a case, the invite, the meal, and the event were all part of one circle of testimony — multiple perspectives, one house.

If Shim‛on the leper = Shim‛on the Pharisee (which is reasonable), then:

  • Luke 7 does not describe a different location.

  • It may indeed be the same house, same meal, same woman — simply emphasizes the sinful past and forgiveness of Miryam more fully.

5. Miryam portrayed as a sinner

  • Luke 7:37 – "A woman in the city who was a sinner…"

  • Her tears, wiping of His feet, and breaking the perfume are not signs of casual devotion — but of radical transformation and love

✅ This fits perfectly with the rest of her character in Luke 10 and John 11–12 — a woman deeply changed, deeply reverent, deeply prophetic.

The same woman — Miryam of Bethany, sister of El‛azar and Martha

At the same location — house of Shim‛on the leper, now healed

Performs one unified act of worship — anointing both head and feet, with tears, hair, fragrance, and faith. Witnessed and interpreted in four distinct ways to reveal the fourfold Messiah.

Her status as a sinner would have probably been a previous state and Simon being a Pharisee still saw her as a sinner 

📖 Luk 7:47  “Therefore I say to you, her many sins have been forgiven, because she loved much. But to whom little is forgiven, he loves little.”

📖 Luk 7:48 And He said to her, “Your sins have been forgiven.”

 📖 Mark 14:9: “Truly I tell you, wherever the gospel is preached throughout the world, what she has done will also be told, in memory of her.”

Simon may well have been referred to as “the Pharisee” in Luke because Luke stresses Yahusha’s ’ reply to Simon’s pharisaical and self-righteous attitude, while the other Gospels remember him as Simon the Leper. 

No leper could host a supper at home unless healed and Pharisee is a religious title.

📖 Matt 9:10  And it came to be, as יהושע sat at the table in the house, that see, many tax collectors and sinners came and sat down with Him and His taught ones.

Yahusha was accused of associating with tax collectors (for Rome) and sinners 

Many people see this woman of Luke 7 is a whore since it says she is a sinner. The sinners is a category given to the outcasts of YasharEL by Pharisees and Saducees. The blind man healed from birth by Yahusha, and testified of Yahusha before them was labelled as a born sinner. 

📖 Jn 9:34  They answered and said to him, “You were completely born in sins – and are you teaching us?” And they cast him out. 

Similarly, Luke is retaining the view Pharisees had of those believing in Yahusha because to them being their disciples under Mosaic Torah would set one free. Since, John in Chapter 12 states she is Miryam, it doesn’t mean she was a prostitute but a Pharisees view of people believing in Yahusha.

Simon the leper is Simon the Pharisee and though being healed he violated Phariseesm because he didn’t give Yahusha water to wash his feet.

📖 Luk 7:44  And turning to the woman He said to Shim‛on, “Do you see this woman? I came into your house – you gave Me no water for My feet, but she has wetted My feet with her tears and wiped them with the hair of her head. 

Though healed, it still shows his heart condition as Yahusha showed him the mirror 

📖 Luk 7:41  “A certain creditor had two debtors. The one owed five hundred denarii, and the other fifty. 

📖 Luk 7:42  “And when they were unable to repay, he forgave them both. Which of them, then, shall love him more?”

📖 Luk 7:43  And Shim‛on answering, said, “I suppose the one whom he forgave more.” And He said to him, “You have rightly judged.”

Yahusha uses 500 and 50 the number of Torah and grace to show that whom he considers a sinner is compliant to Torah of life than him who is an outward Mosiac Torah Compliant and not giving water to wash feet shows he failed even in his Phariseesm. For Pharisees are more concerned with outward washings. 

📖 Mrk 7:3  For the Pharisees, and all the Yehuḏim, do not eat unless they wash their hands thoroughly, holding fast the tradition of the elders,

📖 Mrk 7:4  and coming from the market-place, they do not eat unless they wash. And there are many other traditions which they have received and hold fast – the washing of cups and utensils and copper vessels and couches.

📖 Mark 7:5  Then the Pharisees and scribes asked Him, “Why do Your taught ones not walk according to the tradition of the elders, but eat bread with unwashed hands?”

The woman Miryam with her tears washed His feet and wiped it with her hair and also anointed His head with a nard, the most expensive perfume which was valued at 300 pieces of silver which was a price he would be valued at 30 pieces of silver x 10, a picture of buy back of a bride giving her all for her husband Yahusha to marry her. The woman represents the bride or wife stated in Romans 7


🦁 King (Matthew)
🐂 Sacrifice (Mark)
👤 Human Redeemer (Luke)
🦅 Priest and Judge (John)

Basharah Reference Perspective Emphasis Body Part Anointed Prophetic Role of Yahusha Face / Tribe
Matthew Matt 26:6–13 Kingship, honor before burial    Head 🦁 King / Messiah of YasharEL Yahudah
Mark Mark 14:3–9 Suffering Servant, burial preparation    Head 🐂 Servant / Sacrifice Ephraim
Luke Luke 7:36–50 Mercy to the repentant sinner, forgiveness    Feet 👤 Son of Man / Compassionate Redeemer  Reuben
John John 12:1–8 Love, priestly anointing before crucifixion    Feet 🦅 Priest / Atonement Boundary / Judge   Dan

🌿 Prophetic Fulfillment

Miryam becomes the cherubic worshipper embodying the fourfold dimension of Messiah — each Basharah (gospel) highlights what the Ruach ordained it to reveal through her act of love.

🕰️ Let’s examine the timing in each Gospel:

Now here’s the key issue in Luke 7:

“And one of the Pharisees asked Him to eat with him. And He went into the Pharisee’s house, and sat down to eat…”

No mention of:

  • Passover

  • Bethany

  • Disciples objecting to the waste (instead, Pharisee doubts He’s a prophet)

  • Lazarus, Miryam, or Martha by name

This led some to assume:

  • It must be an earlier and separate event

  • Possibly in Galilee (due to Luke 7's larger context)

BUT — :

  • Nowhere does Luke 7 say Galilee

  • The house is of a man named Shim‛on (same name as in Matt & Mark)

  • The same type of anointing, with weeping, hair, and perfume

  • The woman is called a sinner, which fits Miryam in Shimon' lens.

🧭 What Does This Mean?

📌 The only Gospel that lacks explicit timing is Luke.

But if we stop assuming chronology and instead read the basharah thematically (each one telling the story from its prophetic dimension), then we see:

  • Matthew = kingly focus → head anointing

  • Mark = sacrificial focus → burial emphasis

  • Luke = human compassion → The Pharisees lens sinner forgiven

  • John = priestly love and foreknowledge → burial & seated with the one risen from the dead i.e. El‛azar

🟢 All converge on the same anointingbefore Passover, in Bethany, at Shimon the Leper's house, with Miryam of Bethany, before Yahusha’s death.

🔩Harmonizing the 6 Days vs 2 Days Before Passover

🔍 The Key Puzzle

There seems to be a first blush contradiction:

Account Statement
John 12:1 “Six days before the Passover, Yahusha came to Bethany…”
Matthew 26:2 “After two days is the Passover…”
Mark 14:1 “Now after two days was the Passover…”

🧭 Step-by-Step Understanding

John 12:1–2Arrival in Bethany

“Six days before the Passover, Yahusha came to Běyth Anyah...”
→ This means He arrived at Bethany on the evening that began 9 Abib, which is 6 days before 14 Abib (Passover).

John 12:2–3Supper at Shimon's house

“They made Him a supper there…”
→ The anointing occurred during this supper, which happened the evening after He arrived — that is, the evening that began 10 Abib. This is consistent with the beginning of the observation of the Passover Lamb.

John 12:12Triumphal Entry

“The next day a great crowd… took branches and went out to meet Him…”
→ This was during the day of 10 Abib.

But once we observe when events are reported vs when they occurred, and align with the Torah command in Exodus 12, everything becomes clear.

✅ Yahusha arrives on 9 Abib (evening start)

Is anointed that night → beginning of 10 Abib

Rides into Yerushalayim the next day → 10 Abib

Thus, the anointing and Triumphal Entry both happen on 10 Abib

🛑 The Misunderstanding from Matthew and Mark

📖 Matthew 26:2–6

“You know that after two days is the Passover...”
“Now when Yahusha was in Bethany…”
➡️ This is not a chronological order of events.
It’s a narrative flashback — telling of something that already happened earlier, now inserted thematically before the betrayal of Yahudah/Judas.

📖 Mark 14:1–3

“After two days was the Passover…”
“And being in Bethany, in the house of Shimon the leper…”
➡️ Again, the anointing at Bethany is not placed chronologically, but inserted thematically before the betrayal.

🐑 Torah Prophetic Alignment (Exodus 12) 

Torah Prophecy Fulfillment in Yahusha
Exodus 12:3 – “On the 10th day of the month, each man shall take a lamb…” Yahusha is chosen/anointed on 10 Abib (anointed by Miryam)
Lamb kept 4 days, examined, then slain on 14 Abib Yahusha teaches, is examined, then impaled on 14 Abib
Lamb must be without blemish (Ex 12:5) Yahusha is examined by all and found faultless (Luke 23:4)

📅 Chronological Timeline Table

Date Event Reference
8 Abib (evening) Yahusha departs from Ephrayim to Bethany after Shabbat John 11:54–12:1
9 Abib (day) Yahusha rests or teaches privately in Bethany
9 Abib (evening)Start of 10 Abib Supper at Shimon's house — Miryam anoints Yahusha John 12:2–8, Matt 26:6–13, Mark 14:3–9
10 Abib (day) Triumphal Entry into Yerushalayim (Lamb selection day) John 12:12–15, Matt 21, Mark 11
11 Abib Cleansing of the Temple and public teaching Synoptics (Matt 21:12–17, etc.)
12 Abib Yahusha says, “After two days is the Passover” (when He was in Yerushalayim) Matt 26:2; Mark 14:1
13 Abib Final teachings; Yahudah’s betrayal arranged Luke 22, Matt 26
14 Abib (evening) Last Supper, Gethsemane, arrest, trial begins All Basharah's
14 Abib (day) Yahusha is impaled and buried before sunset
All Basharah's

🔥 Prophetic Insight:

Puzzle / Apparent Conflict Resolution
John 12:1 says 6 days before Passover That was His arrival in Bethany, not the anointing
Matt/Mark say 2 days before Passover = anointing Their statement is narrative flashback, not real-time
Anointing vs Triumphal Entry Both occurred on 10 Abib (evening + day)
Prophetic Lamb selection Matches Exodus 12:3 – Lamb selected on 10 Abib
Anointing for burial Miryam prophetically prepares Yahusha as the Lamb

Yahusha’s anointing by Miryam on 10 Abib fulfills:

  • The setting apart of the Passover Lamb (Exodus 12:3)

  • The prophetic sign of burial (Matt 26:12)

  • The Torah pattern of selection → examination → offering

He is:

  • The Lamb without blemish

  • Anointed before He is inspected

  • Chosen by the people (“Hosanna! Son of David!”)

  • Offered on the 14th as the true Pesach


⛎ Satan deceives to show these are separate events, hides Torah fulfillment, hides the timing. Brings only an emotional love and emotion which is a void of true witness. Satan hid it from the Sanhedrin as they examined him the Lamb on the very day they impaled Him and yet found Him blameless so they raised false witnesses against Him. But as the eagle face shows us the 4th dimensional view, this was the will of Yahuah as this led to the disqualification of the Levitical priesthood as the high priest tore his garments.
Satan dilutes the anointing of Yahusha by bringing to attention a first blush meaning to a carnal mind, creating the confusion whether the event of anointing was at Simon the lepers house, Simon the Pharisee's house, Lazarus's house-thus portraying 3 different women and 3 different houses concealing Bethany where this all took place.
He also conceals the Passover lamb fulfillment as to why Yahusha came to Bethany 6 days before Passover an exact moment of anointing (4 days before Passover), which was for His burial by a WOMAN (depicting YasharEL His bride). 

It prophetically declares:

  • The former husband (Torah as letter) is dying

  • The woman (YasharEL) is preparing her Bridegroom and buying Him back for herself as he was to be sold for 30 pieces of silver. Her nard costs 30 x 10 (pieces of silver) 

  • She anoints Him for burial — knowing she will be joined to Him in resurrection

📖Romans 7:2 “The woman who has a husband is bound by the Torah to her husband as long as he lives. But if the husband dies, she is released from the Torah of the husband.” 

📖Romans 7:4 “So, my brothers, you also died to the Torah through the body of Mashiach, that you might be joined to another — to Him who was raised from the dead.” — 

🧠 Miryam’s act fulfills this exact parable:

  • The woman (YasharEL) anoints the dying Husband (Yahusha in the flesh)

  • She knows He is going to the grave

  • She knows through revelation He will rise, and she will be joined to Him in newness of life

Miryam’s anointing was:

  • Not random perfume it was nard (Song of Songs 1:12; Mark 14:3; John 12:3)

  • It was costly and suggested by Yahudah Iscariot to be sold for 300 denarii and money given to the poor

  • It was linked to burial preparation — as the priests would tend a body

  • Not on a throne — but on feet headed to crucifixion

  • Not for glory — but for death, so that resurrection might come

  • It was offered in love and surrender — mirroring what Levitical priests should have represented

📖 Psalm 23:5“You anoint my head with oil…”
📖 Psalm 133“Like the precious oil on the head… running down to the beard of Aharon…”

The restoration for selling Yahusha would also be 10 times as he was valued at 30 pieces of silver and the basharah is hidden in the Yoseph's account with his brothers.

Yoseph was to have the double portion (birth right) and when Binyamin his brother's lineage as a tribe was given to David's house as the One tribe this would bring David on as equal ground with Yoseph in double portion in ruling over all YasharaEl as David was the son of that Ephrathite of Bayth Lacham/Bethlehem and Ephraim was Yoseph's son. And by bringing Boaz (Yahudite) and Ruth (now an Ephrathite) -both houses from where the Shepherd of YasharEL was prophesied was now made possible.
David was now both the seed of Yahudah and Ephraim and had the son of the right hand i.e. Binyamin with him.

Psa 110:1 יהוה said to my ADON, “Sit at My right hand/yamyin ימין H3225, Until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet.”

If we add 'ban בן' before the word yamyin ימין H3225 we have the name 'binyamin' (Benjamin)

Gen 45:22 He/Yoseph gave to all of them, to each man, changes of garments, but to Binyamin he gave three hundred pieces of silver and five changes of garments.

Five changes of garments show the completeness of Torah where number 5 refers to the 5 Torah books.

Mariyam took a costly perfume of nard, anointed the feet of יהושע (Yahusha) the Son of the Right Hand (Binyamin), and wiped His feet with her hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. When Yahudah from Qerioth who was to sell Yahusha for 30 pieces of silver, he along with others in the house of Shimon valued the perfume at 300 pieces of silver, Yahusha told them to leave her alone and said she has done this to anoint My body for the burial. Satan conceals all these truths.

☀️2. The Resurrection of Yahusha – 4 Gospel Accounts-Differences and reconciliation

Basharah Reference Key Witnesses Stone Rolled Away? Angelic Appearance Yahusha Appears To
Matthew 28:1–10 Miryam of Magdala, the other Miryam Yes 1 angel (speaks, sits on stone) Both Miryams on the way
Mark 16:1–8 (short), 16:9–20 (longer ending) Miryam of Magdala, Miryam (Ya‛aqob’s mother), Shalomah Yes 1 young man (inside tomb) Miryam of Magdala first
Luke 24:1–12 Women from Galil (including Miryam of Magdala, Yoḥanah, Miryam of Ya‛aqov) Yes 2 men in shining garments Kepha later; others at Emmaus
John 20:1–18 Miryam of Magdala alone at first Yes 2 angels inside tomb Miryam of Magdala first

🧩 Notable Differences

Let’s now list the apparent contradictions that need reconciliation:

  1. How many women?

    • Matthew: 2 women

    • Mark: 3 women

    • Luke: multiple (names several)

    • John: 1 woman (Miryam of Magdala)

  2. Who rolls away the stone?

    • Matthew: angel rolls it away with an earthquake

    • Mark, Luke, John: stone is already rolled away

  3. How many angels?

    • Matthew: 1 angel outside the tomb

    • Mark: 1 “young man” inside

    • Luke: 2 men in shining clothes

    • John: 2 angels seated inside

  4. To whom does Yahusha appear first?

    • Matthew: to both Miryams as they run

    • Mark: to Miryam of Magdala

    • Luke: not immediately to the women; later to two on the road and then to the eleven

    • John: to Miryam of Magdala alone, outside the tomb

🔁 Reconciliation of the Events

Let’s now reconcile the events logically and sequentially, assuming that each account tells only part of the story, focusing on the Gospel's prophetic emphasis.

Harmonized Sequence (Early Morning on the First Day of the Week):

🧭 Step-by-Step Harmony of the First Appearances

🕓 1. Very early morning — still dark

Miryam of Magdala and the other Miryam come to the tomb
📖 John 20:1, Matthew 28:1
“...while it was still dark...” (John)
“...as it began to dawn...” (Matthew)

✅ They see the stone is rolled away
✅ They see no body
➡️ They run to tell the disciples

🏃‍♂️ 2. Kepha and Yohanan run to the tomb

📖 John 20:3–10 “Kepha therefore went out... and came to the tomb...”

They saw the linen wrappings, but no body

📖 Luke 24:12 – Kepha sees linen cloths lying alone, marveling

📖 Luke 24:4–6Two men in dazzling garments say,

“He is not here; He is risen!”

✅ The two men (angels) give the first verbal witness of resurrection
✅ Kepha and Yohanan do not yet see Yahusha.

😭 3. Miryam of Magdala returns and weeps

📖 John 20:11–18

She sees two angels inside
Then sees Yahusha, thinks He’s the gardener
Yahusha reveals Himself: “Miryam!”

✅ She is the first person to see the risen Yahusha
✅ Yahusha says: “Do not touch Me, for I have not yet ascended…”

🌅 4. The other women return to the tomb at sunrise

📖 Mark 16:1–5, Luke 24:1–10, Matthew 28:5–8

  • Women: Miryam of Ya‛aqob, Yoḥanah, Shalomah, and others

  • They find the tomb open

  • Angels tell them He is risen

  • They leave joyfully to tell the disciples

✅ Miryam of Magdala may have rejoined them or walked with them again
✅ Now they have heard angelic confirmation

5. Yahusha appears to the group of women on the way

📖 Matthew 28:9–10

“And as they were going to report to His taught ones, Yahusha met them...”
“And they came up and held Him by the feet and bowed to Him.”

Just because Mark 16:1 says all women came to the tomb, that doesn’t mean they all came at one time.

📖Mar 16:1 And when the Sabbath was past, Miryam from Maḡdala, and Miryam the mother of Ya‛aqoḇ, and Shelomah bought spices, to go and anoint Him.

🧠 Prophetic and Thematic Depth

  • 🌿 Garden scene with Miryam = reversal of Eden: new creation begins

  • 👣 Feet held = worship and commission (Matthew)

  • 👑 First to a woman = reversal of shame → honor

  • 🕊️ “Do not touch Me” = high priest must ascend first before being approached (John 20:17 connects to first-fruits as the priest in the temple had not yet offered the waive offering. Hence, fulfillment of it was pending).

  • 🐍 Matthew 12:44-45 records contextually of an evil and adulterous generation of YasharEL in a depraved state, depicted as a house where the unclean spirit returns with seven other more wicked spirits than itself. Driving out 7 demons from Miryam and the mention of it in Luke 8:2 & Mark 16:9 (resurrection account) shows us a picture of Yahuah who drove out 7 nations stronger than YasharEL (Deut 7:1). It was a Torah fulfillment as 'The impure spirit' הרוח הטמאה (ha ruach hatamah) was left behind as a testing program whether they shall keep the way of Yahuah to walk in it as their fathers did or not. This unclean ruach goes to dry places in search of the 7 more unclean spirits than itself and comes back to see the house 'empty, swept and garnished/adorned'. The land had its Shemitah from Yahuah where after occupying it YasharEL sowed for 6 years, and the 7th year was a Shabbath rest for the land (Lev 25). The cycles of Shemitah went on jubilees on jubilees (7 x 7 +1) but YasharEL never understood the intent of them served Yahuah in the pagan unclean way and hence the house is portrayed as 'empty, swept and garnished'.

📖Jud 2:21 I also shall no longer drive out before them any of the nations which Yahushua left when he died.
📖Jud 2:22 in order to test Yisra’El by them, whether they shall keep the way of Yahuah  to walk in it as their fathers did, or no
📖Jud 2:23 So Yahuah left those nations, without quickly driving them out; and He did not give them into the hand of Yahushua.

Galil was the place  where Yahusha fed near Magdala , the 4,000 and the remaining left over of the bread were 7 baskets. (Mark 8:8-10 & Matthew 15: 37-39). Number 4 in scripture speaks of universal & 1000 speaks of completeness of YasharEL's scattering to the 4 ends of the earth and the seven baskets with pieces of bread in it shows that Yahusha reaches out to feed His remnant scattered as the Shemitah denoted by the number 7. The casting of the 7 evil spirits from Mary from Magdala shows that its only Yahusha who can deliver as He is the 'Migdal' (also means tower): out of the increase' to feed His people in the rest from the Shemitah cycles of work.

🔁 4-Dimensional View — The "Split Screen"

Camera Gospel Focus Timing Spiritual Emphasis
📷 1 John Miryam of Magdala from whom 7 demons were cast out While still dark Bride in garden, intimate first witness
📷 2 Mark Miryam of Ya‛aqob + Shalomah When the sun had risen Fear and silence; prophetic fulfillment
📷 3 Luke Referring to dawn (women not named)-hence, it must be Miryam of Magdala + “other Miryam” At early dawn Witness + angelic witness
📷 4 Matthew Miryam of Magdala + “other Miryam” “As it began to dawn” Joy, commissioning, resurrection power

🟨 Each Basharah gives a partial view/dimension, not a contradiction but a layered revelation.

⛎Satan causes the reader to doubt the events of the basharah, hides Torah fulfillment by trying to make believer put carnal Torah efforts of removing literal leaven from their houses and observe the feast in a carnal way (denying Yahusha's effort). Satan's effort is “Focus on outward feast-keeping. Yahusha is just symbolic.” Keep the feast by removing crumbs, not sin.” 
The shadow (removing literal leaven) becomes the substitute for the substance (Yahusha, the Unleavened One, removing sin)

“Do not touch Me” said to Miryam is mistranslated in a shallow manner stating Yahusha had not yet ascended to the Father thus hiding the first-fruits fulfillment, for Yahusha said this because the priest in the temple had not yet offered the waive offering of the first-fruits. Also, His sheaf stood above all of His Brethren (YasharEL) and that allotment would be fulfilled in the best of the stalk being offered. 
Genesis 37:7 (“My sheaf arose and stood upright…”)

 Satan conceals the woman Miriam as twice in the basharah its recorded of Miryam who was from Magdala from whom Yahusha had cast out seven demons mentioned in the texts Luke 8:2 & Mark 16:9 (resurrection account) which was a Torah fulfillment of bringing the outcasts of YasharEL into His Shemitah of rest where the efforts are His work. This was the reason she was the first witness of His resurrection. Her being first at the tomb is not arbitrary — it is prophetic: the rejected one becomes the first witness of New Creation.

Division over details instead of discernment of design : Satan stirs debates: “Was it one angel or two? Did the women come once or twice? Did Miriam see Him alone or with others?” This turns readers away from the 4-dimensional harmony into flat literalism, missing the prophetic symmetry and beauty.

🔥 3. Feeding of the 5,000 – 4 Gospel Accounts-Differences and reconciliation

📜 Step-by-Step Comparison of the Four Accounts

🧍‍♂️ 1. Who initiates the event?

  • Matthew (15:14-21) & Mark (6:35-44): Taught many, then disciples say to send crowd away

  • Luke (9:12-17): Disciples say, “Send them to find food”

  • John (6:5-13): Yahusha initiates → “Where shall we buy bread…?” (testing Philip)

Reconciliation:
Yahusha had compassion, but He also tested the faith and reasoning of His disciples. The human concern from the disciples is recorded in the synoptics, but John reveals the inner test.

🍞 2. Who brings the loaves and fishes?

  • John: “There is a lad here with five barley loaves and two small fish” (6:9)

  • Matthew, Mark, Luke: Just mention “five loaves and two fish”

Reconciliation:
Only John tells us who had the food — a boy. Others only mention the quantity. No contradiction — just additional detail.

🌾 3. Type of bread

  • John only: Barley loaves (6:9)

✅ Prophetic clue: Barley = first fruits, Passover season = Messiah feeding in season of redemption.

🌄 4. Location and crowd

  • All say it was a remote / desert place

  • John specifies: “Went up on a mountain” (6:3)

  • Matthew says: "When Yahusha heard [about Yohanan's death], He withdrew..."

✅ Harmonized: They traveled across the Sea of Galil to a desolate place ( near Bethsaida – Luke 9:10)

🪑 5. How were people seated?

  • Mark: “They sat down in groups of 100s and 50s” (6:40)

  • Luke: “Make them sit in groups of about 50” (9:14)

  • John & Matthew: Just mention the seating

✅ Mark and Luke emphasize order and structure — Yahusha is shepherding like Moshe in the wilderness (Exodus 18:21). Mark reveals a two-dimensional view (side view), while Luke reveals a one-dimensional view (probably the front view). John sees the behind view -the eagles eye and ties it to manna-Yahusha being the bread who came down from heaven and reveals that 12 baskets (12 is number of Yahuah's people) of broken pieces were left over using the 5 barley loaves (5 is the number for Torah).

📖Exo 18:21  “But you yourself, seek out from all the people able men, who fear Elohim, men of truth, hating unfair gain. And place these over them to be rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens. 

🍽️ 6. How many were fed?

  • All say: 5,000 men, besides women and children (only Matthew adds this extra note)

🧺 8. How many baskets of leftovers?

  • All: 12 baskets

✅ Matching the 12 tribes of Yashar’El — one for each, more than enough.

✨  4-Dimensional Symbolism

Basharah Symbol Tribe Message Emphasis
Matthew 🦁 Lion Yahudah           King feeding His nation in the  wilderness
Mark 🐂 Ox Ephraim        Servant King organizing and supplying
Luke 👤 Man Reuben           Human Messiah showing compassion and order
John 🦅 Eagle    Dan           Bread from heaven revealing spiritual Messiah

Basharah Verse Detail Mentioned
Matthew 14:17 “We have here only five loaves and two fishes.”               Basic count
Mark 6:38 “Five loaves and two fishes.”               Same detail
Luke 9:13 “We have no more than five loaves and two fishes…”                Same detail
John 6:9 “...five barley loaves and two small fish...” Only one to say “small” fish and that a boy had them

🐟 Why Two Fishes?

1️⃣ Two Houses of Yashar'El

  • Fish = symbol of multiplication and fruitfulness (cf. Gen 48:16 – “let them grow like a fish”)

📖Gen 48:16  the Messenger who has redeemed me from all evil – bless the youths! And let my name be called upon them, and the name of my fathers Aḇraham and Yitsḥaq. And let them increase/dagah דגה H1711 to a multitude in the midst of the earth.” 

🔠 Word-by-word:

  • וידגו — u'eyidgu = and let them multiply like fish

    • From the root דג (dag) = fish

  • לרבlarab = to a multitude / abundantly

  • בקרב הארץwithin the midst of the land

  • Two fish = Yahudah & Ephrayim

    • Yahusha multiplies what the people of Yahuah can’t supply on their own

    • The two fishes become one offering in His hands — symbol of the unification of the House of Yashar'El

Verse Focus Prophetic Link
Genesis 48:16   Ephrayim and Menashsheh         “Let them multiply like fish”
Genesis 48:19     Ephrayim specifically         “He will become a multitude of nations

✅ So: The "fish blessing" was plural, but the prophetic destiny of nations was placed on Ephrayim alone. And Yahuah brought Ephrayim & Yahudah together through Boaz and Ruth as David was from this lineage.

📖1Sa 17:12  Now Dawiḏ was the son of that Ephrathite of Běyth Leḥem in Yehuḏah, whose name was Yishai, and he had eight sons, and in the days of Sha’ul the man was old among men. 

⛎ Satan brings readers focus to a humanitarian feeding story without Torah understanding of the Exodus parallel — people in the wilderness, fed by the hand of Elohim — and robs it of its covenant significance.  Yahusha said they were like “sheep without a shepherd” (Mark 6:34) — fulfilling Ezekiel 34, the prophecy of scattered Yashar’El.  The 5,000 represent the remnant of the house of Yashar’El in the Torah of Life (number 5 of Torah and Grace x 1000 its completeness) gathered in the wilderness (Deut 8, Hosea 2:14–16).The 12 baskets symbolize the twelve tribes that Messiah restores.

📖Hos 2:14  “Therefore, see, I am alluring her, and shall lead her into the wilderness, and shall speak to her heart, 
📖Hos 2:15  and give to her vineyards from there, and the Valley of Aḵor as a door of expectation. And there she shall respond as in the days of her youth, as in the day when she came up from the land of Mitsrayim. 
📖Hos 2:16  “And it shall be, in that day,” declares יהוה, “that you call Me ‘My Husband,’ and no longer call Me ‘My Ba‛al.’ 

Satan hides the prophetic identity of the 2 fish as "Just part of the meal.” But Genesis 48:16 uses the verb וידגו (they shall multiply like fish) when Ya‛aqob blesses Ephrayim and Menashsheh, where Ephrayim would be the multitudes (fish) of the nations being one with Yahudah in childbearing. Two fish = two houses (Yahudah + Ephrayim) — the remnant through whom the bread (Word of Elohim) is multiplied. The boy with the offering represents the child-like remnant, not the priests or elites. The wilderness is where Yahuah tests and feeds His people to see if they walk in obedience and dependence (Deut 8:2–3). He wants to hide that Yahusha is the Prophet like Mosheh (Deut 18:15), and greater than Mosheh (Heb 3:3).
Satan turns readers away from the 4-dimensional harmony into flat literalism, missing the prophetic symmetry and beauty.

Detail Meaning
100s & 50s        Remnant in wilderness order
Green grass       New creation & Psalm 23 echo
12 baskets       Provision for 12 tribes
5 loaves, 2 fish       Bread of Torah, restoration of 2 houses
Boy giving food          Remnant child offering 

🕊️ 4. The Baptism of Yahusha – 4 Accounts

Basharah   Reference Key Differences Prophetic Focus
Matthew 3:13–17 Dialogue with Yoḥanan: “Permit it to be so now…” Righteous King fulfilling Torah
Mark 1:9–11 Briefest; “Immediately” He comes up from water Obedient Servant identified by Yahuah
Luke 3:21–22 Yahusha was praying when heavens opened Perfect Man in communion
John 1:29–34 Not direct baptism account; Yoḥanan testifies afterward Eternal Lamb / Son of Elohim

Reconciliation:

  • Only Matthew records the dialogue between Yahusha and Yoḥanan.

  • Mark records Yahusha only coming out of the water

  • Luke uniquely mentions that Yahusha was praying at the moment.

  • John doesn’t describe the act itself but records the spiritual testimony of the event afterward: “I saw the Spirit descending…”

  • All affirm: heavens open, Spirit descends, voice from heaven declares Him as the Son.

📖1Pe 3:19  in which also He went and proclaimed unto the spirits in prison, 
📖1Pe 3:20  who were disobedient at one time when the patience of Elohim waited in the days of Noaḥ, while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is, eight beings, were saved through water, 
📖1Pe 3:21  which figure now also saves us: immersion – not a putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward Elohim – through the resurrection of יהושע Messiah, 

✅ Kepha is explicitly saying:
Noaḥ's flood = a prophetic shadow of immersion
Yahusha’s immersion = fulfillment of that shadow

📖 Mark 1:10 “And immediately, coming up from the water, He saw the heavens being torn open, and the Spirit descending upon Him like a dove.”

This is not poetic — it's Noahic imagery:

Noaḥ Yahusha
Flood of judgment                         Immersion into waters of wrath
Ark passes through judgment                        Yahusha fulfills judgment
Dove sent from ark                        Dove descends from heaven (Ruach)
Olive leaf in mouth                        Symbol of restored covenant as He would cleanse us by His own body which passed through waters of wrath.
8 saved souls New creation through Messiah. Number 8 denotes 'shemen/oil'

🕊️The Dove and the Olive Leaf: Symbol of the Covenant

📖 Genesis 8:11“And the dove came to him in the evening, and behold, in her mouth was a freshly plucked olive leaf.”

🔍 The olive leaf is not random:

  • Olive = symbol of Yashar’El (Jer 11:16, Rom 11)

  • Leaf = new growth, life after wrath

✅ So the dove brings the sign of covenant survival.

In Mark, the dove does not leave the ark, it descends and remains upon Yahusha — showing that He is the Ark, the only place where covenant survives judgment.

🧩 Harmony:

  • 4 perspectives of a single heavenly coronation moment

  • Baptism = Priestly consecration + Kingly anointing

  • All 4 Gospels affirm His Sonship, Messiahship, and commissioning


Satan deceives by disconnecting immersion from the judgment that Yahusha told John the Baptist to allow the immersion to fulfill all righteousness for. The Righteousness to be brought was through enduring the wrath. Satan makes it a religious ceremony. Replaces it with circumcision the distinguishing marker from paganism to Yahuah's Covenanted people by leading people in outward washings when clearly Kepha is saying "....which figure now also saves us: immersion – not a putting away of the filth of the flesh...". Satan removes the covenant context of the olive branch, disconnecting it from the restoration of Yashar’El from wrath to a renewed covenant of a rainbow around the throne (again showing a 4 dimension view of the one seated on the throne i.e. the Lamb who appeared as jasper and ruby was the One who endured the wrath and has strengthened the covenant. 

📖Rev 4:3  And He who sat there was like a jasper and a ruby stone in appearance. And there was a rainbow around the throne, like an emerald in appearance. 

📖Exo 28:17  “And you shall put settings of stones in it, four rows of stones: The first row is a ruby, a topaz, and an emerald; 
📖Exo 28:18  and the second row is a turquoise, a sapphire, and a diamond; 
📖Exo 28:19  and the third row is a jacinth, an agate, and an amethyst; 
📖Exo 28:20  and the fourth row is a beryl, and a shoham, and a jasper. They are set in gold settings.

Ruby was the first stone in a high priest breastplate and jasper was the first stone 

Satan blinds readers to the fact that Yahusha is the new Ark, the only vessel that can withstand the flood of Elohim’s justice and bring true rest (Noaḥ = rest).

🌬️ 4. The Triumphal Entry – 4 Accounts

Gospel  Reference Key Differences Prophetic Emphasis
Matthew  21:1–11 2 animals mentioned: donkey and colt Fulfills Zech 9:9 literally – King of Yahudah
Mark 11:1–11 Mentions only the colt, no “Hosanna to Son of David” Messiah as humble Servant
Luke 19:28–44 Weeps over Yerushalayim, stones would cry out Messiah as Man of peace and judgment
John 12:12–19 Crowd brings up resurrection of Lazarus Eternal King, glorified by witnesses

🔑 Reconciliation:

  • Matthew notes both donkey + colt, but Yahusha rides only one — the colt (as others affirm).

  • Luke adds His weeping, showing His heart for Tsiyon.

  • John highlights the reason people flocked — they had seen or heard of Lazarus’s resurrection.

🧩 Harmony:

  • Same entry, 4 angles:

    • 🦁 Matthew – King of prophecy

    • 🐂 Mark – Servant entering humbly

    • 👤 Luke – Weeping Man confronting judgment

    • 🦅 John – Eternal One bringing resurrection


⛎ Satan distorts the Triumphal Entry. The entry recorded in all four Basharah's — is one of the most prophetically rich, Torah-fulfilling, Kingdom-declaring events in Yahusha’s ministry. That's why Satan targets it fiercely — not to erase the story, but to twist its meaning, hide its Torah roots, and divert hearts from recognizing the King of Yashar'El. Dilutes the Kingship to emotional celebration Satan reduces it to an emotional crowd scene — Hosanna becomes just a feel-good cheer and incorporated in hymns with a meaningless rant, wherein Hoshiana in Hebrew means "We beseech you, Save us!". It is a cry to THE LAMB and THE KING.

📖Zechariah 9:9“See, your King comes to you... lowly and riding on a donkey”

All this happened from Bethany to Yerushalayim i.e. 4 days before the Passover. This was the public prophetic fulfillment that the King has come — not as a conqueror, but as the Lamb, on the tenth day of the first month (10 Abib) when lambs were selected (Exodus 12:3). Yahusha was the Lamb being chosen. Satan separates it from Torah feast timing portraying “It’s Palm Sunday!” Hides the fact that 10 Abib was the day the lamb was to be selected and set apart for sacrifice (Exod 12:3–6). Yahusha enters Yerushalayim on that exact day — fulfilling it perfectly. Yahusha entered the city as the Lamb chosen by the people, shouting “Hoshiana!” – Save us now — not knowing He would save them by being slain.

Uses the “riding on a donkey” to make Him look weak, portraying “He’s not a real king — He didn’t come on a horse.” Riding the donkey, the beast of burden was a picture of fulfillment of Torah.

📖 Shemoth (Exodus) 13:13 “And every firstborn of a donkey you shall redeem with a lamb;
and if you do not redeem it, you shall break its neck.”

🧩 Torah teaches:

  • The donkey ( חמור ḥamor) — unclean animal, not fit for sacrifice

  • Must be redeemed by a lamb (שה seh)

  • Or else its neck is broken — symbol of judgment and separation

Symbol Meaning
Donkey      Mankind / nations (beast of burden, unclean)
Lamb      Yahusha, the Lamb of Elohim
Redemption      Mercy through substitutionary sacrifice
Neck broken      Judgment if not redeemed

🔍 Hidden Depth:

  • Yahusha, the Lamb, enters Yerushalayim riding a donkey.

  • In doing so, He is redeeming the donkeythe nations — as He approaches His own sacrifice.

🐑 The Lamb redeems the beast of burden.
💥 If not redeemed, its neck (authority) is broken — a picture of judgment

 Satan hides this legal requirement of Torah being fulfilled — it’s not just humility, it’s a redemption law. Disconnects the Lamb and the Donkey. Judaism often sees Zechariah’s donkey as messianic but misses the redemption law in Shemoth 13:13. Only Yahusha could ride the donkey and redeem it — because only the Lamb can redeem what is unclean. And the donkey is a picture of us-a beast of burden. It was a female donkey who tried to save Balaam's life from the Messenger of Yahuah as its eyes were opened and a mouth speaking was given to her.

🌑 5. Shaul’s Damascus Vision – 4 Accounts

# Source Type Speaker Context
1️⃣ Acts 9:1–19 Narrative Luke Historical record
2️⃣ Acts 22:6–21 Speech Shaul Defense before Hebrew crowd
3️⃣ Acts 26:12–20 Speech Shaul Defense before Agrippa
4️⃣ Galatians 1:11–17 Epistle Shaul Personal testimony to believers

📊 Detailed Comparison of the Damascus Event

Element Acts 9 Acts 22 Acts 26 Galatians 1
Who initiates? Light suddenly from heaven (v3) Great light out of heaven (v6) Light brighter than sun (v13) No detail, says "through revelation"
Time of Day Not mentioned About noon     Midday Not mentioned
Who was present? “Men journeying with him” “Those with me”   “All who journeyed with me” Not mentioned
Light seen? Flashed around him Seen by all, and they were afraid Shone around me and those with me Not mentioned
Voice heard? They heard a voice, saw no one (v7) “They did not hear the voice of Him speaking to me” (v9) Not specified if they heard No mention
Who speaks? “Sha’ul, Sha’ul, why do you persecute Me?” Same + added command to go to Damascus Same + added commission (v16–18) Revelation from Messiah Himself
Language of voice? Not mentioned Not mentioned Hebrew language (v14) Not mentioned
Reaction of companions? Stood speechless, heard voice Saw light, afraid, did not hear voice Not mentioned Not mentioned
Shaul’s reaction? Fell to ground, blinded Fell to ground, blinded, had to be led Fell to ground, receives full commissioning Did not consult men or go to Yerushalayim
Blinded? Yes, healed by ḤananYah Yes Implied Not mentioned
Message received? Go to Damascus for further instructions Same + details of Ananias’ call Commissioned directly by Yahusha “Good News not from man but revelation of Yahusha”
Commissioning details “Chosen vessel to bear My Name to gentiles and kings” (v15) “Witness to all men of what you have seen and heard” Full prophetic commission (vv16–18) Sent to Arabia, not taught by men

🧩 Reconciling the Seeming Contradictions

🔄 “Did the companions hear the voice or not?”

  • 📖Acts 9:7: They heard a voice but saw no one.”

  • 📖Acts 22:9: “They saw the light but did not hear the voice of Him who spoke to me.”

✅ Reconciliation:

  • Greek uses different cases of the verb ἀκούω (akouō = hear)

    • Acts 9:7 uses accusative – they heard the sound

    • Acts 22:9 uses genitive – they did not understand the words

👉 So: They heard a sound, but only Shaul understood the voice

🔄 “Did they see the light or not?”

  • Acts 9:3: The light flashed around him

  • Acts 22:9: “They saw the light and were afraid”

  • Acts 26:13: “Light brighter than the sun shone around me and those with me”

✅ Reconciliation:

  • In all cases, light is seen — but focus varies:

    • Acts 9: personal encounter (centered on Shaul)

    • Acts 22: crowd was afraid (light and presence)

    • Acts 26: entire group is enveloped in the light (but only Shaul receives message)

🔄 “Why does Acts 26 have extra details?”

✅ Because Shaul is testifying before a king, so he:

  • Gives more prophetic context

  • Reveals that Messiah appeared to him not only to stop him, but to send him

  • Declares his commissioning to:

    • Open eyes

    • Turn from darkness to light

    • Transfer from Satan’s authority to Elohim

    • Proclaim forgiveness and inheritance to those set-apart by belief

This is Shaul’s complete apostolic calling revealed only in Acts 26:16–18.

In the Acts 9 and Acts 22 accounts, Luke doesn’t mention that Yahusha spoke with Shaul in the Hebrew tongue, but in writing Shaul’s testimony in Acts 26:14 to King Agrippa, he mentions, “And when we had all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice speaking to me, and saying in the Heḇrew language…..”,  and this indeed clears the air with the understanding of the word ‘shamua’ which should be correctly translated as ‘hearing’ in Acts 9:7 and ‘understand’ in Acts 22:9 as those who journeyed with Shaul were Roman guards executing the letters received from the Sanhedrin to arrest all those in Damascus calling on the name of the Master Yahusha. And as Romans they didn’t understand the Hebrew language but only heard the voice. 

📖Act 26:14 “And when we had all fallen to the ground,….

Whereas in Acts 9:4 & Acts 22:7 Luke only records Shaul falling to the ground and not those who journeyed with him

📖Act 9:4 And he fell to the ground,

📖Act 22:7 and I fell to the ground

This again needs to be understood that an absence of those falling to the ground in Acts 9:4 and 22:7 doesn’t mean that those who journeyed didn’t fall to the ground.

What is important to understand that in all three accounts Shaul is the focus as it’s his testimony and not of the Roman guards journeying with him. Hence, any missing piece or addition of what happened to him and the Roman guards in these accounts don’t account for a contradiction because the spotlight is on Shaul’s encounter with Yahusha ha Mashiyach and not on those who journeyed with him. 

📖Act 9:5 And he said, “Who are You, Master?” And the Master said, “I am יהושע, whom you persecute. It is hard for you to kick against the prods.”

📖Act 22:8 “And I answered, ‘Who are You, Master?’ And He said to me, ‘I am יהושע of Natsareth, whom you persecute.’

📖Act 26:15 “And I said, ‘Who are You, Master?’ And He said, ‘I am יהושע, whom you persecute.

While Shaul mentions what exactly he heard and testified to the Yahudites verbatim because they considered ‘Natsarim’ a cult/sect and they needed to know that the Master introduced himself as a Natsareth so that they believe, while before king Agrippa he didn’t seem it necessary to mention Yahusha’s introduction to him as a Natsareth because king Agrippa knew the practices of the Yahudim and believed in the prophets and also understood Shaul’s position well. Luke also doesn’t mention Yahusha introducing himself as a ‘Natsari’ in Acts 9 which is a historical account of Shaul’s conversion.

📖Act 26:27 “Sovereign Agrippa, do you believe the prophets? I know that you do believe.”

You may read the detailed differences and consolidation of Shaul's accounts here: https://dsouzashodan72.blogspot.com/2018/05/shauls-conversion-accounts-in-acts-9-22.html

🧩 Galatians 1 as Internal Confirmation

Shaul adds:

  • He received no human instruction

  • He went to Arabia first, not to Yerushalayim

  • This backs the idea that his calling came directly from Yahusha, not from the other emissaries

Satan relentlessly attacks and distorts these four accounts to confuse, discredit, or conceal the prophetic power of Shaul's call. Claims Contradiction in What Was Heard/Seen by deceiving 🤔 “In Acts 9:7, they heard the voice but saw no one. In Acts 22:9, they saw the light but didn’t hear the voice. That’s a contradiction!” Satan tries to discredit Scripture by manipulating the wording differences.

He hides the Greek nuance:

Acts 9:7: They heard the sound (φωνῆς – genitive) but not the words.

Acts 22:9: They didn’t understand the voice (φωνή – accusative).

Whereas, they heard a sound but didn’t comprehend the message — only Shaul did, as the message was for him alone.

❗Satan exploits the English translation to create a contradiction, suggesting the Bible is unreliable.
❗Satan hides the Greek nuance, knowing most readers won’t notice.
❗By doing this, he undermines Shaul’s testimony and Yahusha’s appearance to him.

All three accounts agree the light was real and seen with a difference in emphasis:

Acts 9: personal perspective — light affects Shaul.
Acts 22: crowd reaction — fear and light.
Acts 26: broader scope — whole group enveloped.

❗Satan paints these as different events with inconsistent descriptions.
❗Satan uses this to argue the resurrection was not real or that Shaul lied.
❗Satan hides that Yahusha’s light is prophetic , pointing to the true Light to the nations.

Shaul is testifying before King Agrippa who understood the prophets, so he shares the full heavenly commission Yahusha gave him:

📖Acts 26:18 “To open eyes, turn them from darkness to light, from the power of Satan to Elohim…” 

Satan naturalizes the supernatural by saying Shaul added to his testimony by saying the prophetic commission Yahusha gave in Acts 26:16–18 was unreal.

❗He accuses Shaul of “changing his story.”
❗He causes some believers to mistrust Acts 9 or Acts 22 because Acts 26 is “too different.”
❗He hides the prophetic weight: this is a Yah-appointed calling to confront Satan directly.

Satan flattens the Four-Fold Revelation into a Confused Narrative. He presents the four accounts (Acts 9, 22, 26, Galatians 1) as contradictory or repetitive. Causes the reader to dismiss the variations as “mistakes” or “exaggerations”

🦂Satan hides the bird eye view (eagle face):

Account Face Angle of Revelation
Acts 9 🐂Ox       Servant narrative — the beginning of the transformation, Yahusha’s sovereignty
Acts 22 👤Man     Witness to men — defense before the Jewish crowd, humility and obedience
Acts 26 🦅Eagle     Heavenly commission — divine authority to confront darkness and powers
Galatians 1 🦁 Lion     Apostolic authority — not from men, but from Messiah directly

Satan sows Division Between "Pauline" and "Messianic" Believers

🔍 What Satan does:

  • Uses the complexity of Shaul’s calling to create divisions:

    • “Paul invented Christianity”

    • “Paul’s gospel is different from Yahusha’s”

    • “Paul led people away from Torah”

Focus is on Paulos the Greek rather than Shaul the Hebrew whose name was called in Hebrew by the Adon when He appeared to him. 

Satan portrays Shaul as non Torah compliant concealing understanding of the transition from Torah of sin and death to Torah of Life.

📖Act 16:4  And as they (Shaul and the company) went through the cities, they delivered to them the regulations to keep, which were decided by the emissaries and elders at Yerushalayim. 

Acts 16:4 is clear that Shaul was compliant to the teachings decided by the emissaries and elders at Yerushalayim.

In Galatians 2, he even says after 14 years he went upto Yerushalayim to confirm the revelations he himself had received when in the apostolic commission and he and Barnaba were given the right hand of fellowship.

Shaul himself humbly admits that he sat under Kepha's teaching for 15 days

📖Gal 1:18  Then after three years I went up to Yerushalayim to learn from Kěpha, and remained with him for fifteen days. 

Satan tries to erase the Context of Language, Audience, and Purpose: Ignores the audience-specific nature of each account:
  • Acts 9: Luke’s narration to Theophilus

  • Acts 22: Shaul before Jewish hearers (Hebrew, quoting Torah)

  • Acts 26: Roman king Agrippa (legal-prophetic argument)

  • Galatians 1: Shaul defending heavenly authority

The variations are not contradictions — they are 4 prophetic dimensions of the same throne-revelation, just as the 4 cherubim faces point in all directions at once.

By discrediting Shaul from his apostleship, satan works in hearts of men to remove the witness of Luke of the basharah he wrote portraying Son of Man / Humanity in witness standing before Roman (beastly kingdom)-Theophilos, Hebrew nation as a Natsarim, Before Agrippa as a defender of the prophetic voice & to the Galatians as the apostolic commissioned one.

By doing this people who fall for his deception, discredit Yahuah's revelation in a 4 dimensional view.

🧿 Ezekiel’s Vision by the River Chebar (Ezekiel 1 & 10)

  • Reference: Ezekiel was in captivity in Babylon when he received these visions

    • Ezekiel 1:5–14 (initial vision)

    • Ezekiel 10 (repetition with added detail and clarification)

  • Description: Ezekiel sees four living creatures (חיות chayot), each with four faces (man, lion, ox, and eagle), and four wings.
    They are beneath a firmament with a throne above, and above the throne is the appearance of the glory of Yahuah.

  • Symbolism: These beings are later identified as cherubim in Ezekiel 10. The four faces represent attributes of Elohim:

    • Man = wisdom/intellect

    • Lion = kingship/authority

    • Ox = strength/service

    • Eagle = swiftness/spirit

👑 John’s Vision in Revelation (Revelation 4:6–9)

  • Reference: John was on island Patmos in captivity

    • Revelation 4:6–8

  • Description:
    In Heaven, around the throne, John sees four living creatures, each with a single face:

    • 1st like a lion

    • 2nd like a calf

    • 3rd like a man

    • 4th like a flying eagle

    • Each has six wings and is full of eyes.

  • Connection to Ezekiel: The same four attributes (faces) are here, but each creature has one face rather than all four.
    These are also throne guardians and cry out, "Holy, Holy, Holy...", echoing Isaiah 6.

🔲 The 4 Prophets Who Saw the 4-Faced Beings or Heavenly Creatures

Prophet Setting Political Condition Vision of What Was Revealed Who Was Seen
Yeḥezqĕl (Ezekiel) 👑 Babylonian exile (Chebar River)       No king in Yahudah 4 Living Creatures (kerubim) Throne-chariot (Merkabah) of Yahuah Yahusha in esteem (see 1:26–28)
Daniy’ĕl (Daniel) 👑 Babylonian palace (exile) Gentile king rules (Nebuchadnezzar) 4 Beasts & Ancient of Days Judgment of kingdoms; divine court Son of Adam receives dominion
YashaYahu (Isaiah) 🏛 Yerushalayim, Temple vision Uzziah leprous and died seeking priesthood. 7th monarch from last monarch. Seraphim around throne Set-apartness and cleansing; temple filled with robe Yahusha (John 12:41)
Yoḥanan (John) 🇮🇹 Patmos under Roman exile Rome rules over Yahudah 4 Living Creatures + 24 elders Worship, judgment, Lamb enthroned Yahusha the Lamb (Rev 5:6–9)

📖 John 12:41 “Yeshayahu said these things because he saw His glory and spoke about Him.”

  • YashaYahu saw Yahusha’s priestly kingship.

  • The robe (שׁוּל / shul) filling the Temple refers to the hem of the High Priest’s garments.

    • With bells and pomegranates on the hem: the fruit of righteousness and announcement of entry (Ex. 28:33–34)

  • This robe covering the floor of the temple signals:
    👉 The earthly kingship & priesthood is currently suspended — now Yahusha rules as High Priest and King.

 Uzziah, a king who tried to take the priesthood, was struck with leprosy. At that precise moment:

📖 Yeshayahu 6:1“In the year that king Uzziah died, I saw the Adon high and lifted up...” 

  • No earthly king

  • No qualified high priest

  • Yahuah shows the true King-PriestYahusha.

👑 Why All These Visions Came in Captivity or Crisis

Prophet Earthly Authority Collapsed Yahusha Revealed As…
Ezekiel       Temple destroyed, exile     Throne on wheels (He rules over all lands)
Daniel     Gentile rule over Yashar’El      Son of Adam crowned King
YashaYahu    King leprous, priesthood compromised     High Priest-King in temple
John Rome rules, Temple destroyed again Slain Lamb, reigning from heaven

⛎ Satan wants to hide this pattern: that in times of collapse, Yahuah reveals Yahusha’s throne more clearly than ever. He isolates each vision — disconnects them from one another. He reduces them to “apocalyptic imagery” without fulfillment in Yahusha. He hides the identity of the One seated — by diverting attention to creatures, beasts, or timelines. He disconnects Yahusha from Torah symbols (robe, temple, throne, cherubim). He hides the fact that these visions come when earthly kingdoms collapse — and only Yahusha reigns.

🧩 4-Dimensional Unveiling of the King-Priest

Face Basharah Prophet What Was Seen
🦁 Lion Matthew Daniel              Royal dominion of the Son of Adam
🐂Ox Mark Ezekiel              Servant-chariot of glory in exile
👤 Man Luke YashaYahu             Cleansing of sinful lips before a witness before beastly kingdoms (human frailty)
🦅 Eagle John John (Patmos)            Heaven opened, throne revealed

Summary

The note explores the intricate biblical symbolism of the four faces of the cherubim and the four rivers of Eden, presenting them as interconnected patterns that reveal the multidimensional nature of Yahuah’s divine revelation, with a particular emphasis on the eagle face as the dimension behind the throne, unveiling dark secrets and Satan’s unwitting role in Yahuah’s plan for the elect. These symbols, rooted in Scripture, reflect a single divine source expressed through four perspectives, each carrying the same spiritual DNA. The analysis connects these symbols to key events in the Basharah (Gospel accounts) and prophetic visions, demonstrating a unified fourfold revelation of Yahusha as King, Servant, Man, and Priest, while exposing the adversary’s attempts to obscure this truth. The Ruach (Spirit) enables discernment of this harmony, particularly through the eagle’s perspective, which reveals hidden spiritual realities to Yahuah’s elect.

The Four Rivers of Eden

The note begins with Genesis 2:10–14, describing a single river flowing from Eden, dividing into four heads: Pishon, Gihon, Hiddekel, and Perat (Euphrates). Each river is analyzed for its geographical, linguistic, and prophetic significance:

  • Pishon ("Spreading, Overflow"): Associated with Havilah, symbolizing abundance and Kingdom wealth, paralleling Matthew’s Gospel, which portrays Yahusha as the King of Yahudah.

  • Gihon ("Gushing Forth"): Linked to Cush and Solomon’s anointing, representing deliverance and priesthood, aligning with Mark’s Gospel, emphasizing Yahusha as the Servant.

  • Hiddekel ("Swift, Sharp Voice"): Connected to the Tigris and Assyria, symbolizing prophetic precision and truth, corresponding to Luke’s Gospel, presenting Yahusha as the Son of Man.

  • Perat ("Fruitfulness"): The Euphrates, a boundary of the Promised Land, signifies inheritance and final judgment, tying to John’s Gospel, portraying Yahusha as the eternal Son of Elohim.

These rivers illustrate one divine source (Eden) flowing into four expressions, mirroring the fourfold testimony of the Basharah and the four faces of the cherubim.

The Four Faces of the Cherubim

The cherubim, described in Ezekiel 1 and 10 and Revelation 4, each bear four faces (man, lion, ox, eagle), symbolizing the multifaceted nature of Yahusha’s identity:

  • Lion: Represents kingship and authority, linked to Yahudah and Matthew’s Gospel.

  • Ox: Symbolizes service and sacrifice, tied to Ephraim and Mark’s Gospel.

  • Man: Reflects humanity and compassion, associated with Reuben and Luke’s Gospel.

  • Eagle: Denotes divine perspective, swiftness, and the unveiling of hidden spiritual realities, connected to Dan and John’s Gospel. Positioned behind the cherub, the eagle face represents the dimension behind the throne, revealing dark secrets and Satan’s role in Yahuah’s plan.

In Ezekiel, each cherub has all four faces, emphasizing the completeness of Elohim’s revelation. In Revelation, each creature has a single face, highlighting distinct roles. The eagle face, described as “behind” (Ezekiel 1:10, Revelation 4:7), signifies the unseen heavenly realm, exposing the adversary’s schemes and how they inadvertently fulfill Yahuah’s purposes, a truth discerned only by the elect. The note contrasts these with Daniel’s four beasts (Daniel 7), which represent earthly kingdoms influenced by Satan, distorting the divine pattern to conceal the true revelation.

The Eagle Face: Revealing Dark Secrets

The eagle face, positioned behind the cherub, symbolizes the prophetic vision that pierces the unseen realm, revealing dark secrets and the adversary’s strategies. Drawing from Job 1:7, where Satan is described as “roaming” (שוט, shut) the earth, the note connects this to his deceptive tactics, using the Torah as a whip to accuse and enslave. The Hebrew term שוט links “roaming” to “whipping,” illustrating Satan’s attempt to twist Yahuah’s Word into a tool of condemnation. However, the eagle’s perspective reveals that Satan’s actions, though intended for evil, fall into Yahuah’s sovereign plan. For example, in Yahusha’s crucifixion, Satan’s deception of the Sanhedrin (e.g., false witnesses, the high priest tearing his garments) led to the disqualification of the Levitical priesthood, fulfilling Yahuah’s purpose to establish Yahusha as the eternal High Priest (Hebrews 7). This bird’s-eye view, granted to the elect through the Ruach, exposes Satan’s schemes and affirms Yahuah’s ultimate authority, as seen in Revelation 4:8, where the creatures’ eyes “around and within” signify total visibility of divine truth.

Fourfold Gospel Accounts

The note examines five key events in Yahusha’s life, each recorded in the four Gospels, demonstrating how their variations reflect a four-dimensional perspective, with the eagle face revealing Satan’s deceptions within Yahuah’s plan:

  1. The Anointing of Yahusha:

    • Matthew (26:6–13): Emphasizes kingship, with Miryam anointing Yahusha’s head in Bethany, fulfilling the Messiah’s role.

    • Mark (14:3–9): Highlights Yahusha as the suffering Servant, focusing on burial preparation.

    • Luke (7:36–50): Portrays Yahusha as the compassionate Son of Man, forgiving Miryam, who anoints His feet.

    • John (12:1–8): Presents Yahusha as Priest and Judge, with Miryam’s anointing of His feet tied to resurrection and atonement, seen through the eagle’s lens as a prophetic act fulfilling Torah.

    Reconciliation: The accounts describe a single event in Bethany, four days before Passover, with Miryam of Bethany as the anointer, and His arrival 6 days before Passover. The eagle face reveals Satan’s attempt to obscure this by suggesting multiple women or locations, hiding the Torah fulfillment of the Passover lamb selection (Exodus 12:3) and Yashar’El’s role as the bride preparing her Bridegroom (Romans 7:2–4).

  2. The Resurrection:

    • Matthew (28:1–10): Focuses on joy and commissioning, with two Miryams.

    • Mark (16:1–8): Emphasizes fear and silence, with three women.

    • Luke (24:1–12): Highlights angelic witness and multiple women.

    • John (20:1–18): Centers on Miryam of Magdala’s encounter, revealing Yahusha as the new creation’s initiator.

    Reconciliation: The variations are harmonized as sequential events, with Miryam of Magdala as the first witness, fulfilling Torah (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:1, seven nations). The eagle face exposes Satan’s distortion of “Do not touch Me” (John 20:17) as a shallow prohibition, concealing Yahusha’s role as Firstfruits and the restoration of Yashar’El.

  3. Feeding of the 5,000:

    • Matthew (14:13–21): Yahusha as King feeding His nation.

    • Mark (6:30–44): Yahusha as Servant organizing provision.

    • Luke (9:10–17): Yahusha as compassionate Man.

    • John (6:1–14): Yahusha as Bread from Heaven, with two fish symbolizing Yahudah and Ephraim (Genesis 48:16).

    Reconciliation: The accounts align, with John’s eagle perspective revealing the Torah’s unification of the two houses. Satan reduces this to a humanitarian act, hiding its covenant significance.

  4. The Baptism of Yahusha:

    • Matthew (3:13–17): Yahusha fulfills Torah righteousness as King.

    • Mark (1:9–11): Yahusha as obedient Servant.

    • Luke (3:21–22): Yahusha as praying Man.

    • John (1:29–34): Yahusha as eternal Lamb.

    Reconciliation: All affirm the Spirit’s descent, with the eagle face revealing Yahusha as the new Ark (1 Peter 3:19–21). Satan portrays it as a ritual, obscuring its judgment and covenant fulfillment.

  5. The Triumphal Entry:

    • Matthew (21:1–11): Yahusha as King fulfilling Zechariah 9:9.

    • Mark (11:1–11): Yahusha as humble Servant.

    • Luke (19:28–44): Yahusha as Man of peace and judgment.

    • John (12:12–19): Yahusha as eternal King, tied to Lazarus’s resurrection.

    Reconciliation: Occurring on 10 Abib, it fulfills Exodus 12:3 and 13:13 (donkey redemption). The eagle face reveals Satan’s attempt to reduce it to “Palm Sunday,” hiding Yahusha’s role as the redeeming Lamb.

Shaul’s Damascus Vision

The note analyzes four accounts (Acts 9, 22, 26; Galatians 1):

  • Acts 9: Luke’s narrative of Yahusha’s sovereignty.

  • Acts 22: Shaul’s defense to Jews, emphasizing humility.

  • Acts 26: Testimony before Agrippa, revealing the Hebrew language and apostolic commission.

  • Galatians 1: Direct revelation, bypassing human teaching.

Reconciliation: Differences (e.g., companions hearing vs. understanding) are resolved through Greek grammar and audience context. The eagle face exposes Satan’s manipulation of translations to suggest contradictions, hiding Shaul’s Torah-compliant commission (Acts 16:4) and the prophetic call to confront darkness (Acts 26:18).

Prophetic Visions

The cherubim’s four faces connect to the visions of Ezekiel, Daniel, Isaiah, and John:

  • Ezekiel (1, 10): Yahusha on a throne-chariot in exile.

  • Daniel (7): Son of Adam crowned, contrasting Satan’s beasts.

  • Isaiah (6): Yahusha as High Priest-King amid crisis.

  • John (Revelation 4–5): Slain Lamb reigning.

The eagle face reveals Satan’s schemes in each vision, such as isolating them as mere imagery to obscure Yahusha’s identity. For the elect, it unveils how Satan’s actions (e.g., inspiring earthly kingdoms) fulfill Yahuah’s plan to reveal Yahusha’s supremacy.

Satan’s Deceptions and Yahuah’s Plan

The eagle face behind the cherub unveils Satan’s tactics:

  • Twisting Torah: Using it as a whip (Job 1:7, שוט) to accuse, yet falling into Yahuah’s plan (e.g., the crucifixion disqualifying the Levitical priesthood).

  • Creating Contradictions: Exploiting translation nuances to discredit Scripture.

  • Obscuring Fulfillment: Reducing events to emotional or ritualistic acts, hiding Torah connections (e.g., Passover, Firstfruits).

  • Dividing Believers: Pitting Shaul against Yahusha, ignoring his Torah compliance.

The elect, through the Ruach, discern that Satan’s schemes—though deceptive—are subsumed into Yahuah’s sovereign will, as seen in Revelation 4:8’s “eyes around and within,” signifying total visibility of truth.

Conclusion

The note underscores the unity of Scripture’s fourfold pattern—cherubim faces, Eden’s rivers, Gospel accounts, and prophetic visions—as a multidimensional revelation of Yahusha. The eagle face, positioned behind, unveils hidden truths and Satan’s role in Yahuah’s plan, discerned only by the elect. Each perspective (lion, ox, man, eagle) fulfills Torah, uniting Yashar’El and revealing Yahusha as King, Servant, Man, and Priest, from Eden to the New Yerushalayim.